281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 280 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Achter Titel: Arrest; K. Dahinfallen
Art. 280 SchKG
Der Arrest fällt dahin, wenn der Gläubiger: 1. die Fristen nach Artikel 279 nicht einhält; 2. die Klage oder die Betreibung zurückzieht oder erlöschen lässt; oder 3. mit seiner Klage vom Gericht endgültig abgewiesen wird.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (72)
ABS 2009 377 · be (Art. 280 Ziff. 1 und 2 SchKG)
Supervisory Authority Appeal Regarding Late Prosecution of Debt Enforcement After Inheritance Attachment
Cited to establish that the missed prosecution deadline only causes the attachment to lapse, but not the debt collection proceedings themselves.
A/2552/2024 · ge (art. 279 et 280 LP)
Former Spouse Challenge to Multi-Canton Lien Validation Dismissed
Cited by the appellant as the basis for the alleged lapse (caducité) of the attachment, which the court ruled against.
14.2023.118 · ti (art. 280 n. 1 LEF)
Asset Seizure Appeal: Bank Account and Company Income
The appeal was granted because the previous seizure had lapsed due to the failure to pursue execution, justifying a new seizure.
A/3507/2021 · ge (art. 280 ch. 1 LP)
Debtor v. Enforcement Office: Deadline for Creditor's Debt Acknowledgment Action After Provisional Lifting Rejection
Cited as the legal consequence (cessation of seizure effects) of failing to respect the deadlines set out in Art. 279 LP.
15.2023.22 · ti (Art. 280 n. 1 LEF)
Creditor's Failure to Timely Request Seizure Continuation After Unappealable Opposition Rejection
Cited as the legal basis for the revocation (caducity) of the seizure if the validation deadlines under Art. 279 LEF are not met.
PS230080 · zh (Art. 280 Ziff. 1 SchKG)
Creditor's Failure to Prove Timely Wage Attachment Prosecution Renders Appeal Moot
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the lapse of the arrest if not prosecuted, providing the legal context for the non-admission in order 1.
15.2023.16 · ti (art. 280 n. 1 LEF)
Property Seizure Validation in Foreign Litigation Context
The provision governing the revocation of the seizure if validation terms are not respected, which is the core issue addressed.
A/4335/2022 · ge (art. 280 LP)
Enforcement Office Decision Upheld Regarding Attachment Validity and Statute of Limitations
Cited in the reasoning to establish that a seizure lapses if the deadlines in Art. 279 LP are missed.
PS220176 · zh (Art. 280 Ziff. 1 SchKG)
Lapsed Arrest Seizure Due to Creditor's Inaction
The court used this provision to determine that the arrest had lapsed due to the creditor's failure to meet the prosecution deadlines.
105 2021 105 · fr (art. 280 al. 3 LP)
Attachment Validity and Security Fund Release Following Declaratory Judgment Action
This provision is cited in the reasoning leading to the rejection of the appeal concerning the validity of the security, although the dispositive itself only refers to the confirmation of the lower authority's decision.
A/1580/2021 · ge (art. 280 ch. 1 LP)
Seizure Validation Limits and Enforcement File Access
Cited as the consequence (lapsing of the seizure) for non-compliance with validation deadlines.
A/1581/2021 · ge (art. 280 ch. 1 LP)
Sequestration Appeal Regarding Third-Party Debt Validation Limits and Document Access
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the provisional participation in the seizure requires the attachment not to have lapsed due to insufficient validation.
A/1583/2021 · ge (art. 280 ch. 1 LP)
Creditor's Right to Seizure File Access and Validation Correction
The court implicitly considered that the seizure would lapse if validation requirements were not met.
KSK 2021 43 · gr (Art. 280 SchKG)
Debt Collection Jurisdiction Overruled Based on Untimely Prosecution Finding
Cited by the lower court in its reasoning as the provision governing the lapsing of the arrest if the continuation period is not respected.
15.2020.32 · ti (Art. 280 n. 1 LEF)
Debtor's Appeal on Seizure Lapsing Dismissed; Creditor's Appeal on Fund Release Upheld
This article sets the consequence (revocation of the seizure) if the deadlines under Art. 279 LEF are not met, which is the core subject of the first appeal.