Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
281.1 SCHKGLPLEF CH

Art. 182 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)

SchKG; Fünfter Titel: Betreibung auf Konkurs; II. Wechselbetreibung; C. Rechtsvorschlag; 4. Bewilligung
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (404 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 182 SchKG

Das Gericht bewilligt den Rechtsvorschlag: 1. wenn durch Urkunden bewiesen wird, dass die Schuld an den Inhaber des Wechsels oder Checks bezahlt oder durch denselben nachgelassen oder gestundet ist; 2. wenn Fälschung des Titels glaubhaft gemacht wird; 3. wenn eine aus dem Wechselrechte hervorgehende Einrede begründet erscheint; 4. wenn eine andere nach Artikel 1007 OR zulässige Einrede geltend gemacht wird, die glaubhaft erscheint; in diesem Falle muss jedoch die Forderungssumme in Geld oder Wertschriften hinterlegt oder eine gleichwertige Sicherheit geleistet werden.

← Art. 181 SchKG Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG) Art. 183 SchKG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (41)

ZK 2009 38 · be (Art. 182 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Denial of Suspension of Promissory Note Enforcement Despite Austrian Applicable Law
Cited by the court when discussing the Appellant's claim that the date was forged, although ultimately reviewed under Art. 182 Ziff. 3 SchKG.
ZK 2009 38 · be (Art. 182 Ziff. 3 SchKG)
Denial of Suspension of Promissory Note Enforcement Despite Austrian Applicable Law
The provision used to review one of the substantive grounds for the objection regarding the formal requirements of the bill of exchange.
ZK 2009 38 · be (Art. 182 Ziff. 4 SchKG)
Denial of Suspension of Promissory Note Enforcement Despite Austrian Applicable Law
The provision used to review the objection concerning the set-off (Verrechnungseinrede) and the objection regarding misuse of a blank bill (Blankettmissbrauch).
ZZ.1993.10 · so (Art. 182 Ziff. 3 SchKG)
Bill of Exchange Enforcement Standing and Objection Procedure
Cited because the debtor's challenge to the creditor's standing constitutes an objection arising from the law of bills of exchange, leading to the granting of legal objection.
ZZ.1974.11 · so (Art. 182 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Debt Enforcement on Bill of Exchange Validity
Cited as the ground for rejecting the appellant's claim based on alleged forgery.
ZZ.1974.11 · so (Art. 182 Ziff. 3 SchKG)
Debt Enforcement on Bill of Exchange Validity
Cited as the ground for rejecting the appellant's claim based on the alleged invalidity of the title under bill of exchange law.
C/7870/2020 · ge (art. 182 ch. 3 LP)
Promissory Note Validity and Partial Payment Enforcement
This provision was part of the discussion regarding the admissibility of the opposition based on exceptions related to exchange law, which the court ultimately confirmed were not sufficient to overturn the lower court's ruling on the core issue (though the final ruling confirmed the original judgment for the most part).
C/7917/2020 · ge (art. 182 ch. 3 LP)
Appeal Regarding Validity of Instruments Labeled "Promissory Note Guaranteed" as Bills of Exchange
Mentioned in the reasoning section as the basis for appeal admissibility concerning exceptions in an exchange instrument, although the final order confirms the lower court's decision regarding the substance.
C/5110/2016 · ge (art. 182 ch. 3 LP)
Promissory Note Collection Proceeding Without Presentation of Originals
This provision governs when a judge declares an opposition admissible based on exceptions that appear founded, which was the core issue of the appeal concerning the enforceability of the bill of exchange.
AbR.2000.01.Nr.26 · ow (Art. 182 Ziff. 3 SchKG)
Promissory Note Ambiguity Voids Bill of Exchange Proceeding
Used to allow the opposition because a defense arising from bill of exchange law appeared justified.
C/9315/2014 · ge (Art. 182 ch. 1 LP)
Debt Enforcement Over Promissory Notes and Payment Plan Validity
This article establishes the grounds for oppositions in promissory note proceedings, which the court used to rule on the admissibility of the opposition regarding the first bill of exchange.
Poursuite.effet.chan · vd (Art. 182 LP)
Creditor Standing in Debt Enforcement Based on Endorsed and Cancelled Checks
The decision to confirm the lower court's ruling declaring the opposition admissible is implicitly based on the criteria for declaring opposition admissible listed in this article, even though the specific sub-section justifying the admissibility was superseded by other findings.
Poursuite.effet.chan · vd (Art. 182 LP)
Bill of Exchange Collection Proceeding: Validity of Aval and Interest/Fee Liability
The court partially upheld the appeal by modifying the decision on the inadmissibility of the opposition, based on the grounds provided in Art. 182 LP concerning admissible exceptions in exchange law proceedings.
Poursuite.effet.chan · vd (Art. 182 LP)
Bill of Exchange Validity and Summary Enforcement Opposition
Cited in the reasoning defining the grounds on which the debtor can oppose the procedure.
Poursuite.effet.change.2010.1 · vd (Art. 182 ch. 3 LP)
Appeal of Bill of Exchange Enforcement Based on Invalidity and Misidentification of Payee
Cited in the reasoning regarding grounds for declaring the opposition admissible, which supports the final decision.