281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 153 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Vierter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfandverwertung; B. Zahlungsbefehl; 2. Ausfertigung. Stellung des Dritteigentümers des Pfandes
Art. 153 SchKG
Die Ausfertigung des Zahlungsbefehls erfolgt gemäss Artikel 70.
Das Betreibungsamt stellt auch folgenden Personen einen Zahlungsbefehl zu: a. dem Dritten, der das Pfand bestellt oder den Pfandgegenstand zu Eigentum erworben hat; b. dem Ehegatten, der eingetragenen Partnerin oder dem eingetragenen Partner des Schuldners oder des Dritten, falls das verpfändete Grundstück als Familienwohnung (Art. 169 ZGB ) oder als gemeinsame Wohnung (Art. 14 des Partnerschaftsgesetzes vom 18. Juni 2004 ) dient. Der Dritte und der Ehegatte können Rechtsvorschlag erheben wie der Schuldner.
Die in Absatz 2 genannten Personen können Rechtsvorschlag erheben wie der Schuldner.
Hat der Dritte das Ablösungsverfahren eingeleitet (Art. 828 und 829 ZGB), so kann das Grundstück nur verwertet werden, wenn der betreibende Gläubiger nach Beendigung dieses Verfahrens dem Betreibungsamt nachweist, dass ihm für die in Betreibung gesetzte Forderung noch ein Pfandrecht am Grundstück zusteht.
Im Übrigen finden mit Bezug auf Zahlungsbefehl und Rechtsvorschlag die Bestimmungen der Artikel 71–86 Anwendung.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (79)
BGE 152 III 103 (Art. 153 Abs. 2 SchKG)
Payment order for debt collection by real property sale against a spouse as third-party owner suffices; no second payment order as spouse of the debtor under family-home protection.
Basis for the decision that a payment order to a third-party owner suffices and no additional notification as spouse is required.
PKG 1995 38 · gr (Art. 153 SchKG)
Third-Party Acquisition of Pledged Property During Foreclosure Requires Subsequent Notice to Pay
Cited in the reasoning regarding the mandatory delivery of a copy of the payment order to the third owner, which is confirmed as a basis for the required procedural step in the dispositive context.
C/8146/2025 · ge (art. 153 al. 2 let. b LP)
Mortgage Enforcement Opposition Lifting Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the notification of the enforcement order to the spouse in real estate pledge enforcement proceedings.
C/8146/2025 · ge (art. 153 al. 4 LP)
Mortgage Enforcement Opposition Lifting Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicability of articles 71 to 86 ss LP in pledge enforcement proceedings involving a spouse.
73----------- · vd (art. 153 al. 2 let. a LP)
Mortgage Opposition Lifting Upheld Despite Validity and Land Law Challenges
This provision was cited in the context of explaining why four payment orders were reasonably sent, although the final rejection decision does not explicitly rely on it for the outcome.
PS230077 · zh (Art. 153 Abs. 2 Ziff. b SchKG)
Supervisory Review of Debt Enforcement Notification Dismissed Due to Factual Misrepresentation
Cited in the reasoning to explain the appellant's ground for appeal, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
A/2202/2022 · ge (art. 153 al. 2 bis LP)
Challenging Validity of Property Seizure Payment Order Against Estate Heir
Cited in the reasoning, concerning the third-party owner's right to opposition (relevant context for the ruling).
A/2202/2022 · ge (art. 153 al. 2 let. a LP)
Challenging Validity of Property Seizure Payment Order Against Estate Heir
Cited in the reasoning, confirming the legal basis for notifying the third-party owner (which was the contested notification).
ML.2022.82 · vd (Art. 153 al. 2 let. b LP)
Foreclosure Opposition Lifted Against Spouse Based on Proper Service and Existing Judgments
This provision was used to justify the notification of the payment order to the spouse in the context of a real estate pledge enforcement.
ML.2022.83 · vd (Art. 153 al. 2 let. b LP)
Spousal Foreclosure Opposition Lifted Due to Valid Service and Prior Judgments
Cited in the final order (II) implicitly, as the court confirmed the lower court's decision which hinged on the validity of the proceeding against the spouse based on this provision.
A/2746/2021 · ge (art. 153 al. 2 let. a LP)
Foreclosure Payment Orders Validity in Undivided Estate Proceedings
Cited as the basis for notifying the estate (as owner of the collateral) in the context of proceedings to realize a pledge.
A/615/2020 · ge (art. 153 al. 2 let. b LP)
Spousal Service in Debt Enforcement and Foreclosure Challenge
Cited by the Federal Tribunal in the remanding decision to establish the basis for the complainant's initial complaint regarding lack of notification to the spouse in procedure no. 7.
A/4092/2020 · ge (art. 153 al. 2 let. b LP)
Spousal Notice Nullification in Real Estate Mortgage Enforcement Appeal
This provision is the basis for notifying the spouse in a real estate execution when the property is the family home, which justifies the nullity of the decision that cancelled this notification.
ML.2021.114 · vd (Art. 153 al. 2 LP)
Third-Party Property Owner Liability in Mortgage Foreclosure Appeal
This provision concerning the notification to the third-party owner was central to the court's acceptance of the appellant's standing as a co-debtor in the enforcement proceedings, justifying the partial admission of the appeal.
A/615/2020 · ge (art. 153 al. 2 let. b LP)
Spouse's Challenge to Foreclosure Nullity Rejected Due to Prior Knowledge
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the failure to notify the spouse, which was the core substantive issue leading to the rejection of the claim.