Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
281.1 SCHKGLPLEF CH

Art. 148 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)

SchKG; Dritter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfändung ; II. Verwertung; D. Verteilung; 3. Kollokationsplan und Verteilungsliste; c. Anfechtung durch Klage
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (404 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 148 SchKG

Will ein Gläubiger die Forderung oder den Rang eines andern Gläubigers bestreiten, so muss er gegen diesen innert 20 Tagen nach Empfang des Auszuges beim Gericht des Betreibungsortes Kollokationsklage erheben.

...

Heisst das Gericht die Klage gut, so weist es den nach der Verteilungsliste auf den Beklagten entfallenden Anteil am Verwertungserlös dem Kläger zu, soweit dies zur Deckung seines in der Verteilungsliste ausgewiesenen Verlustes und der Prozesskosten nötig ist. Ein allfälliger Überschuss verbleibt dem Beklagten.

← Art. 147 SchKG Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG) Art. 149 SchKG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)

15.2020.13 · ti (Art. 148 LEF)
Provisional Distribution Order Annulled Due to Claim Contestation
The appeal of RI 1 was granted on the subordinate request because RI 1 had introduced an action to contest the ranking (giusta l’art. 148 LEF) against RI 2, which prevents a provisional distribution.
CC.2004.122 · ne (Art. 148 al. 1 LP)
Mortgage Certificate Annulment Rejected Due to Director's Death
This procedural rule determines the venue for the action contesting the statement of claims, which the court confirmed as competent in the preliminary considerations.
Plainte.2009.38 · vd (Art. 147 et 148 LP)
Creditor Challenge to Distribution Schedule Interest Rate and Proper Venue
These articles govern the distribution of proceeds and the recourse against the distribution statement, relevant to the court's decision regarding the appeal.
15.2000.00129 · ti (art. 148 LEF)
Appeal Against Attachment Order of Compensatory Damages Claimed Immune from Civil Execution
Cited in the concluding reference list, indicating the proper procedure for challenging the distribution claim, which the court deferred to.
15.2000.116 · ti (art. 146-148 LEF)
Supervisory Appeal Dismissal for Untimely Filing in Estate Property Auction Distribution
These articles define the procedure for creditor ranking and distribution against which the appeals were made (declared inadmissible in orders 2 and 3).
15.2000.116 · ti (art. 148 LEF)
Debtor's Untimely Appeal of Debt Enforcement Division Scheme and Costs
Cited in the final order (implicitly via the reference list) as the legal context concerning appeal objections to the ranking (although the substance of Orders 2 and 3 is based on procedural grounds concerning the appeal itself).
15.2003.23 · ti (art. 148 cpv. 3 LEF)
Debtor's Challenge to Updated Debt Enforcement Charges Rejected Due to Prior Untimely Objection and Lack of Standing on Judicially Confirmed Debt
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the actor's priority right in the legal dispute (not explicitly in dispositive, but referenced via Art. 157(4) LP/SchKG which is cited in the list).
15.2020.13 · ti (art. 148 LEF)
Debt Enforcement Schedule Nullification Due to Pending Contest Action
The appeal of RI 1 was partially granted because the existence of a pending action for contestation of the distribution ranking (Art. 148 LEF) against RI 2 constituted an impediment to proceeding with the provisional distribution.
15.2021.12 · ti (art. 148 cpv. 1 LEF)
Appeal Against Distribution Schedule Untimely
Cited in the reasoning to explain the standard 20-day deadline for creditors to contest the distribution statement, contrasting it with the debtor's recourse.
Faillite.2025.11 · vd (Art. 148 LP)
Debtor's Appeal of Bankruptcy Dismissal Time-Barred and Lacking Specific Argumentation
Cited as the legal basis governing the admissibility of the appeal against the decision rejecting the request for restoration of time limits.