281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 134 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Dritter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfändung ; II. Verwertung; C. Verwertung der Grundstücke; 2. Steigerungsbedingungen; a. Auflegung
Art. 134 SchKG
Die Steigerungsbedingungen sind vom Betreibungsamte in ortsüblicher Weise aufzustellen und so einzurichten, dass sich ein möglichst günstiges Ergebnis erwarten lässt.
Dieselben werden mindestens zehn Tage vor der Steigerung im Lokal des Betreibungsamtes zu jedermanns Einsicht aufgelegt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (49)
SBK 2025 29 · gr (Art. 134 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Enforcement Sale Conditions for Combined Real Estate Units
This article's requirement for setting conditions that lead to the most favorable result implicitly justifies the alteration of the conditions regarding Z.2._____ and Z.3._____.
15.2024.82 · ti (art. 134 cpv. 1 e 259 LEF)
Bankruptcy Estate Property Sale Bidding Procedure
The ruling orders the modification of auction conditions based on the interest of all creditors and the debtor, citing these provisions in conjunction.
15.2024.82 · ti (art. 134 cpv. 2, per il rinvio dell’art. 259 LEF)
Bankruptcy Estate Property Sale Bidding Procedure
This provision, referred to in the reasoning for setting a new auction date, is part of the procedural mechanism for setting the new auction date.
42.2023.24 · ti (art. 134 cpv. 1 LEF)
Social Assistance Property Sale Obligation Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Reissuance of Order
Cited in reasoning regarding the conditions under which an auction must be conducted to obtain the highest possible sum.
A/4281/2022 · ge (art. 134 al. 1 LP)
Debtor's Challenge to Property Auction Dismissed Due to Untimely Procedural Objections
Cited to define the content and requirement of the conditions of sale.
A/4281/2022 · ge (art. 134 al. 2 LP)
Debtor's Challenge to Property Auction Dismissed Due to Untimely Procedural Objections
Cited to define the requirement for depositing the conditions of sale.
15.2020.118 · ti (Art. 134 cpv. 1 LEF)
Foreclosure Auction Postponement Denied Over Encumbrance Dispute and COVID-19 Restrictions
Cited as the principle of maximization of proceeds, which was considered but did not impede the auction.
15.2020.5 · ti (art. 134 cpv. 1 LEF)
Property Auction Postponement and Viewing Rights Dispute
Cited in consideration 2.1 as the general requirement that the execution office must establish conditions to obtain the highest possible sum, which informs the subsequent finding that inspection opportunities must be granted.
Plainte.2020.7 · vd (Art. 134 LP)
Appeal Regarding Real Estate Auction Conditions and Minimum Bid Deadline
Cited in the reasoning regarding the setting of sale conditions, but the dispositive rejected the appeal primarily on procedural grounds (untimeliness).
15.2018.39 · ti (art. 134 cpv. 1 LEF)
Appeal Regarding Bankruptcy Aircraft Sale Procedural Fairness Dismissed for Lack of Standing
Cited in the reasoning alongside Art. 259 LEF regarding the requirement for complete and non-contradictory information.
Plainte.2018.5 · vd (Art. 134 LP)
Appeal Regarding Untimely Challenge to Property Auction Sale Conditions
This provision relates to the conditions of real estate auctions, which the appellant contested and whose rejection led to the appeal.
OG AB 17 15 · ar (Art. 134 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Debtor's Appeal Against Property Auction Vacate Date Denied
Cited in the reasoning to explain the establishment of auction conditions, but not used in the final orders 1 or 2.
Plainte.2017.28 · vd (Art. 134 LP)
Debtor's Appeal Challenging Foreclosure Auction Rejected for Being Res Judicata and Lack of Merit
The main issue regarding the conditions of sale was implicitly addressed when the court rejected the appeal, as this article was cited in the reasoning related to the main ground for the decision.
Plainte.2017.15 · vd (Art. 134 LP)
Appeal Regarding Minimum Bid Price in Judicial Sale of Mortgaged Property
The appeal regarding the main request (modification of sales conditions) was rejected based on this provision, as the court found no abuse of discretion by the enforcement office under this article.
Plainte.2016.9 · vd (Art. 134 LP)
Property Owner v. Enforcement Office Regarding Foreclosure Minimum Bid
Cited in the initial header and discussed in the reasoning regarding the manner of the sale being most advantageous, although the final decision relies more heavily on Art. 126 LP for the outcome.