Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
281.1 SCHKGLPLEF CH

Art. 122 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)

SchKG; Dritter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfändung ; II. Verwertung; B. Verwertung von beweglichen Sachen und Forderungen; 1. Fristen; a. Im allgemeinen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (404 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 122 SchKG

Bewegliche Sachen und Forderungen werden vom Betreibungsamt frühestens zehn Tage und spätestens zwei Monate nach Eingang des Begehrens verwertet.

Die Verwertung hängender oder stehender Früchte darf ohne Zustimmung des Schuldners nicht vor der Reife stattfinden.

← Art. 121 SchKG Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG) Art. 123 SchKG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (31)

BGE 85 III 68 (Art. 122 SchKG)
Conditional withdrawal of a seizure request in debt collection: withdrawal conditioned on debtor's partial payment treated as unconditional; collection requests and their withdrawal are incompatible with conditions.
Sets a fixed deadline for executing collection requests, making conditional requests incompatible with the law.
A/1033/2023 · ge (art. 122 al. 1 LP)
Challenge to Public Auction of Seized Alcoholic Beverages
Cited in the reasoning when rejecting the appellant's argument concerning the execution deadline for movable property.
15.2018.30 · ti (art. 122 LEF)
Execution Appeal: Seizure of Private Pension Annuity vs. Minimum Subsistence Level Abroad
Cited in the reasoning concerning the short deadlines for realizing seized assets.
15.2018.42 · ti (art. 122 cpv. 1 LEF)
Execution Office v. Co-Heirs: Realization Method for Heir's Estate Share
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the time limits for realizing movable assets, although deemed inapplicable to the current matter.
Plainte.2018.15 · vd (Art. 122 LP)
Creditor's Appeal Regarding Enforcement Sale Under Moratorium and Partial Realization Request
Cited in the reasoning regarding the realization deadline, which was determined to be superseded by the suspension under Art. 109 LP.
ABS 2016 321 · be (Art. 122 SchKG)
Supervisory Authority Upholds Denial of Supplementary Attachment After Certificate of Loss Issued
Cited in the reasoning concerning the maximum time limit for realization, on which the appeal regarding its violation was declared inadmissible.
A/2341/2016 · ge (art. 122 al. 1 LP)
Heirs v. Enforcement Office (Unjustified Delay in Executing Secured Sale)
Cited, along with art. 156 al. 1 LP, to establish the expected deadline for realizing movable goods, demonstrating the unjustifiable delay.
AbR.1984.85.Nr.32 · ow (Art. 122 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Creditor v. Enforcement Office (Pig Sale Delay)
Cited as the legal basis for the deadline for selling movable assets, which the enforcement officer failed to meet.
15.2015.7 · ti (art. 122 cpv. 1 LEF)
Creditor v. Enforcement Office: Delayed Asset Realization Appeal
Cited in the reasoning as the statutory term (two months) for realizing movable property, which was exceeded, justifying the order in point 1.
A/258/2014 · ge (art. 122 LP)
Unjustified Delay in Forced Sale of Seized Assets
The delay in realizing the assets was found incompatible with the maximum two-month period stipulated in this article.
15.2013.37 · ti (Art. 122 cpv. 1 LEF)
Appeal Against Auction of Unascertainable Credit Claim
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the timing of the auction, supporting the rejection of the appeal.
A/2504/2012 · ge (art. 122 al. 1 LP)
Creditor Complaint Against Enforcement Office Delay Rejected Due to Installment Payments
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadline for realizing movable assets after receiving a request for sale.
A/389/2012 · ge (art. 122 al. 1 LP)
Creditor v. Enforcement Office Regarding Delayed Sale of Seized Assets
Cited as the rule detailing the time limit for realizing movable assets after the sale requisition.
Plainte.2010.26 · vd (Art. 122 al. 1 LP)
Debtor v. Enforcement Office (Artwork Sale Deadline)
Cited in the reasoning section when analyzing the time limit for the enforcement office to proceed with the realization of movable property.
A/644/2010 · ge (Art. 122 LP)
Judgment Debtor's Challenge to Provisional Seizure Valuation of Contested Receivable
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the deadline for realization, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1 or 2.