281.1 SCHKGLPLEF

CH

Art. 111 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)

SchKG; Dritter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfändung ; I. Pfändung ; F. Pfändungsanschluss; 2. Privilegierter Anschluss

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (404 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 111 SchKG

An der Pfändung können ohne vorgängige Betreibung innert 40 Tagen nach ihrem Vollzug teilnehmen: 1. der Ehegatte, die eingetragene Partnerin oder der eingetragene Partner des Schuldners; 2. die Kinder des Schuldners für Forderungen aus dem elterlichen Verhältnis und volljährige Personen für Forderungen aus einem Vorsorgeauftrag (Art. 360–369 ZGB ); 3. die volljährigen Kinder und die Grosskinder des Schuldners für die Forderungen aus den Artikeln 334 und 334 bis ZGB; 4. der Pfründer des Schuldners für seine Ersatzforderung nach Artikel 529 OR .

Die Personen nach Absatz 1 Ziffern 1 und 2 können ihr Recht nur geltend machen, wenn die Pfändung während der Ehe, der eingetragenen Partnerschaft, des elterlichen Verhältnisses oder der Wirksamkeit des Vorsorgeauftrags oder innert eines Jahres nach deren Ende erfolgt ist; die Dauer eines Prozess- oder Betreibungsverfahrens wird dabei nicht mitgerechnet. Anstelle der Kinder oder einer Person unter einer Massnahme des Erwachsenenschutzes kann auch die Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzbehörde die Anschlusserklärung abgeben.

Soweit dem Betreibungsamt anschlussberechtigte Personen bekannt sind, teilt es diesen die Pfändung durch uneingeschriebenen Brief mit.

Das Betreibungsamt gibt dem Schuldner und den Gläubigern von einem solchen Anspruch Kenntnis und setzt ihnen eine Frist von zehn Tagen zur Bestreitung.

Wird der Anspruch bestritten, so findet die Teilnahme nur mit dem Recht einer provisorischen Pfändung statt, und der Ansprecher muss innert 20 Tagen beim Gericht des Betreibungsortes klagen; nutzt er die Frist nicht, so fällt seine Teilnahme dahin. ...

← Art. 110 SchKG Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG) Art. 112 SchKG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)

ZK 2013 188 · be (Art. 111 SchKG)

Ancillary Action Procedural Type and Advance on Costs under Swiss Debt Collection Act

Cited as the subject matter for which the court determined the applicable procedure (Anschlussklage).

BGE 138 III 145 (Art. 111 SchKG)

Subrogation under Art. 289 Abs. 2 ZGB transfers to the advancing public entity the child support creditor's right to privileged attachment joinder under Art. 111 SchKG.

Main ground for the decision: held that privileged joinder to an attachment is available to a public entity subrogated to child maintenance claims.

ZSU.2024.231 · ag (Art. 111 Abs. 1 SchKG)

Creditor's Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Address Lower Court's Reasoning on Lack of Valid Title for Provisional Execution

Used to offset the court costs against the advance payment made by the appellant.

C/7541/2021 · ge (Art. 111 al. 1 LP)

State's Appeal on Privileged Participation in Child Support Seizure Dismissed

The final order rejects the appeal, implicitly confirming the lower court's finding that the main ground for not admitting the privileged participation was not met (i.e., the conditions under Art. 111 al. 1 LP were not satisfied in this specific context, as detailed in the reasoning).

RT210170 · zh (Art. 111 Abs. 3 SchKG)

Alimony Enforcement Appeal Dismissed on Procedural Grounds

Although listed in the applicant's initial demands (Urk. 21, Point 1), this provision was not used in the final dispositive orders.

C/15694/2020 · ge (art. 111 LP)

Government Entity's Right to Privileged Participation in Seizure Following Spousal Maintenance Claim Cession

The main issue was the right of the SCARPA to privileged participation in the seizure, based on this article, which was admitted in the final orders.

KSK 2021 1 · gr (Art. 111 Abs. 1 und 2 SchKG)

Appeal Regarding Supplementary Attachment for Support Claims vs. Procedural Legality Review

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to contest the privileged attachment notice within the statutory period, as required by this article regarding the substantive basis of the attachment.

93/2004/17 · sh (Art. 111 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 und Abs. 2 SchKG)

Provisional Legal Cost Contribution in Divorce Proceedings and Privileged Joinder to Seizure

This provision is cited as the legal basis allowing the spouse to join an existing attachment proceeding for a claim between spouses (the advance for litigation costs).

A/4435/2019 · ge (Art. 111 al. 3 LP)

Children's Claim for Restitution of Seizure Participation Deadline Denied Despite Enforcement Office's Failure to Notify

The court found that the Office failed in its duty to notify the creditors of their right to participate in the seizure, as required by this article.

ABS 2013 117 · be (Art. 111 Abs. 4 SchKG)

Supervisory Review of Refusal to Allow Privileged Attachment Accession Based on Bankruptcy Loss Certificate

The court ordered the authority to notify the debtor and creditors of the request for joining the attachment and set a ten-day deadline for objection.

ABS 2013 117 · be (Art. 111 SchKG)

Supervisory Review of Refusal to Allow Privileged Attachment Accession Based on Bankruptcy Loss Certificate

The appeal was granted, resulting in the annulment of the challenged decision regarding the privileged attachment joinder based on Art. 111 SchKG.

A/58/2013 · ge (art. 111 LP)

State Agency v. Enforcement Office Regarding Child Support Collection Delays

Cited in the reasoning section regarding provisional distribution, but not explicitly in the final orders as a basis for the decision itself.

PS110070 · zh (Art. 111 SchKG)

Municipality v. Debt Collection Office on Privileged Joinder for Spousal Maintenance Arrears

The court's decision to uphold the appeal is based on the substantive rules regarding privileged attachment claims, as implied by the annulment of the administrative decisions concerning this claim.

Plainte.2009.38 · vd (art. 111 LP)

Creditor Challenge to Distribution Schedule Interest Rate and Proper Venue

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the scope of the office's examination, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

AP.2009.120 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 ch. 1 LP)

Spousal Debt Recognition and Lien Challenge

This provision was cited in the lower court's decision regarding the privileged nature of the claim, which was partially upheld by the appeal court.