281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 108 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Dritter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfändung ; I. Pfändung ; E. Ansprüche Dritter (Widerspruchsverfahren); 2. Durchsetzung; b. Bei Gewahrsam oder Mitgewahrsam des Dritten
Art. 108 SchKG
Gläubiger und Schuldner können gegen den Dritten auf Aberkennung seines Anspruchs klagen, wenn sich der Anspruch bezieht auf: 1. eine bewegliche Sache im Gewahrsam oder Mitgewahrsam des Dritten; 2. eine Forderung oder ein anderes Recht, sofern die Berechtigung des Dritten wahrscheinlicher ist als diejenige des Schuldners; 3. ein Grundstück, sofern er sich aus dem Grundbuch ergibt.
Das Betreibungsamt setzt ihnen dazu eine Frist von 20 Tagen.
Wird keine Klage eingereicht, so gilt der Anspruch in der betreffenden Betreibung als anerkannt.
Auf Verlangen des Gläubigers oder des Schuldners wird der Dritte aufgefordert, innerhalb der Klagefrist seine Beweismittel beim Betreibungsamt zur Einsicht vorzulegen. Artikel 73 Absatz 2 gilt sinngemäss.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (156)
ABS 2008 241 · be (Art. 108 SchKG)
Supervisory Authority Rules Enforcement Agencies Lack Jurisdiction Over Disputed Rent Amounts in Foreclosure Proceedings
The underlying decision was to set a deadline for the creditor to file a contestation lawsuit (Widerspruchsklage) under this provision, which was subsequently annulled.
A/414/2025 · ge (art. 108 al. 1 ch. 2 LP)
Tax Administration Appeals Regarding Third-Party Claims on Sequestered Rental Income
Cited in the dispositive as part of the underlying procedure (Office's decision to set a deadline for contestation) which was upheld by rejecting the AFC's appeal.
C/11978/2022 · ge (Art. 108 LP)
Creditor Challenges Donation as Fictitious Shield Against Seizure
Cited as the rule governing the administrative phase of the third-party claim procedure, specifically concerning the deadline for filing an action to contest the claim.
C/1756/2018 · ge (art. 108 LP)
Appellant's Challenge to Sequestration of Jewelry Based on Saudi Law Ownership Claim
Cited to define the role of the third-party claimant (défendeur) in the revendication procedure.
A/2463/2023 · ge (Art. 108 LP)
State and Confederation vs. Enforcement Office on Attachment Record Revisions and Untimely Third-Party Claim
The court's decision to admit the complaint partially is based on deeming the claim by F______/1______ CORP as time-barred, which concerns the procedure for contesting third-party claims established under Article 108 LP, as confirmed by the order to modify the seizure reports accordingly.
A/218/2023 · ge (art. 108 LP)
Enforcement Office Authority in Third-Party Ownership Claims Over Seized Shares
The court confirmed the Office's decision to set a deadline for the appellant to file an action contesting the third-party claim, which is based on this article.
C/9665/2019 · ge (Art. 108 al. 1 ch. 2 LP)
Third-Party Claim to Bank Account Funds Denied Despite Beneficial Ownership Designation
Cited in the reasoning section describing the conditions for the creditor to initiate an action to contest a third-party claim, which is the legal framework for the initial decision being appealed.
15.2022.2 · ti (art. 108 cpv. 1 n. 2 LEF)
Creditor Appeal Regarding Third-Party Claim Deadline in Asset Attachment
Cited as the basis for imposing the time limit on the creditor (RI 1) to contest the claim brought by the third parties (PI 2 and PI 3).
15.2021.134 · ti (art. 107 e 108 LEF)
Tax Seizure and Vital Minimum Challenge Appeal
Cited regarding the procedure following the seizure record.
A/3838/2021 · ge (art. 108 LP)
Creditors' Challenge to Seizure Deadline Inadmissible Due to Lack of Demonstrated Prejudice
The court declared the appeal inadmissible/rejected it, referring to the order whose delay for filing action was set according to this article, which is the procedural context of the dispute.
15.2022.3 · ti (art. 108 cpv. 1 n. 3 e cpv. 2 per il rinvio degli art. 140 cpv. 2 e 156 cpv. 1 LEF)
Appeal Regarding Deadlines for Contesting Encumbrances in Foreclosure Proceedings
These articles concerning the debtor's duty to contest claims are cited in the reasoning (para. 5) explaining why the time limit assignments for charges 4 and 5 were upheld, although not explicitly in the final orders, they govern the basis for upholding the order.
A/1432/2021 · ge (art. 108 LP)
Appeals Regarding Insufficient Asset Investigation and Misapplication of Third-Party Claim Procedures in Seizure Records
The court found that the Office wrongly applied this procedure for D______'s claim, but correctly applied it for E______'s lien claim over bank assets.
A/293/2021 · ge (art. 108 al. 1 et 2 LP)
Bank's Complaint Against Asset Transfer Inadmissible Due to Lack of Standing and Improper Procedural Challenge
This provision was discussed in relation to the review of the Office's decision rejecting the third-party claim, which was deemed final and which C______ INC failed to challenge via the appropriate legal remedy.
KSK 2021 39 · gr (Art. 108 Abs. 1 Ziff. 3 SchKG)
Appeal Against Debt Collection Office Regarding Encumbrance List and Action to Contest Claim
The court confirmed that the procedural rule regarding setting a deadline for the action for vindication (plaintiff role assignment) was correctly applied by the lower authority, as the challenged claims derived from the land register.
KSK 2021 7 · gr (Art. 108 SchKG)
Enforcement Office Supervisory Decision Challenge Regarding Third-Party Claim Burden of Proof and Preliminary Procedure
This provision was cited in the dispositive order (Order 2) as the basis for reapplying the deadline for the declaratory action concerning the third-party claim.