273
BZPPCFPC
CH
CH
Art. 58 Bundesgesetz vom 4. Dezember 1947 über den Bundeszivilprozess (BZP)
BZP; Siebenter Titel: Beweis; 2. Beweismittel; d. Sachverständige; Ernennung
Art. 58 BZP
Für Sachverständige gelten die Ausstandsgründe nach Artikel 34 BGG sinngemäss.
Die Parteien erhalten Gelegenheit, vor der Ernennung von Sachverständigen Einwendungen gegen die in Aussicht Genommenen vorzubringen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)
A-2871/2024 (Art. 58 Abs. 1 BZP)
Accessibility of Double-Decker Train Ramps for Wheelchair Users
Specifies grounds for recusal of experts.
B-2285/2024 (Art. 58 al. 2 PCF)
Recognition of Foreign Osteopathy Diploma - Compensation Measures Ordered
Specifies the right of parties to object to the designation of experts.
5V 23 211 5V 24 48 · lu (Art. 58 BZP)
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Suspension Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof of Fault and Failure to Investigate
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to recuse oneself due to bias.
A/4094/2022 · ge (Art. 58 alinéa 1 PCF par le truchement des articles 19 PA et 55 PLGA)
Appeal of Cessation of Accident Insurance Benefits for Ankle Injury
Cited as the standard for expert recusal grounds, applied via reference to other procedural laws (used in reasoning context for background).
A/2017/2020 · ge (Art. 58 al. 1 PCF)
Claimant v. Social Insurance Institution: Disability Pension and CRPS Appeal Mandating Judicial Expert Examination
Cited as the basis for expert challenges, via Articles 19 PA and 55 LPGA.
B-7216/2014 (Art. 58 Abs. 2 BZP)
Public Procurement: Tunnel Construction Contract Award Upheld
Cited regarding party rights to raise objections to the expert and comment on questions.
UV.2007.00057 · zh (Art. 58 Abs. 2 BZP)
Insurance Benefits Termination Appeal Granted Due to Procedural Due Process Violations
This procedural rule concerning the right to object to the expert was cited in the reasoning leading up to the decision to annul the decision and remit the matter.
FO.2007.0003 · vd (Art. 58 al. 1er PCF)
Commission Decision Annulled Due to Apparent Bias in Valuation Procedure
Cited in the reasoning concerning the grounds for recusal alongside Art. 34 LTF, justifying the admission of the appeal due to bias.
IV.2006.76 · sg (Art. 58 BZP)
Disability Benefits Appeal: Procedural Defect Cured, MEDAS Assessment Upheld
Cited in conjunction with other procedural rules concerning the right to be heard and the use of expert opinions, which was deemed healed.
JAAC 66.104 (Art. 58 Abs. 2 BZP)
Gaming Machine Classification: Skill vs. Gambling
This provision grants parties the opportunity to raise objections against proposed experts, which was discussed in relation to the procedure used by the ESBK.
35.2002.83 · ti (art. 58 cpv. 2 PCF)
Cleaner v. Insurer (Hip Injury, Undervalued Residual Injury)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the insured's right to object to nominated experts.