Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 99 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Sicherheit für die Parteientschädigung

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 8. Titel: Prozesskosten und unentgeltliche Rechtspflege; 1. Kapitel: Prozesskosten
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 99 ZPO · Sicherheit für die Parteientschädigung

Die klagende Partei hat auf Antrag der beklagten Partei für deren Parteientschädigung Sicherheit zu leisten, wenn sie: a. keinen Wohnsitz oder Sitz in der Schweiz hat; b. zahlungsunfähig erscheint, namentlich wenn gegen sie der Konkurs eröffnet oder ein Nachlassverfahren im Gang ist oder Verlustscheine bestehen; c. Prozesskosten aus früheren Verfahren schuldet; oder d. wenn andere Gründe für eine erhebliche Gefährdung der Parteientschädigung bestehen.

Bei notwendiger Streitgenossenschaft ist nur dann Sicherheit zu leisten, wenn bei allen Streitgenossen eine der Voraussetzungen gegeben ist.

Keine Sicherheit ist zu leisten: a. im vereinfachten Verfahren mit Ausnahme der vermögensrechtlichen Streitigkeiten nach Artikel 243 Absatz 1; b. im Scheidungsverfahren; c. im summarischen Verfahren mit Ausnahme des Rechtsschutzes in klaren Fällen (Art. 257); d. im Verfahren wegen einer Streitigkeit nach dem DSG .

← Art. 98 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 100 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (612)

VVGE.1981.82.Nr.52 · ow (Art. 99 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Compulsory Placement Legal Aid Jurisdiction
Applied by analogy to determine the jurisdiction in administrative court proceedings.
AbR.1980.81.Nr.17 · ow (Art. 99 Abs. 4 ZPO)
Opposing Party Status in Legal Aid Appeals
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of an appeal against the denial or withdrawal of legal aid, but ultimately found not applicable to the opposing party in this specific context.
ZK 2014 262 · be (Art. 99 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)
Security for Party Costs Following Withdrawal and Refiling of Lawsuit
This provision establishes the basis (security for party costs due to outstanding costs from a previous proceeding) for obliging the claimant to provide security.
O2025-005 (Art. 99 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO)
Security for Costs in Foreign Plaintiff Cases
This provision mandates the plaintiff to provide security for the defendant's party costs if the plaintiff has no domicile or seat in Switzerland, which was the basis for ordering security.
O2025-005 (Art. 99 ZPO)
Security for Costs in Foreign Plaintiff Cases
The court interpreted this article regarding the timing and scope of security for party costs, influencing the final order on the amount and deadline.
C/15061/2024 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Security for Costs in Cross-Border Appeal
The general basis for the obligation to provide security, although applied in the context of the appeal procedure.
C/2327/2022 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Revision Security for Costs Determination
The court applied the rule concerning the requirement to provide security for costs based on the debtor being liable for prior procedure costs.
C/26061/2013 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Security for Costs on Appeal Following Relocation Abroad
This provision established the ground for accepting the request for security for costs because the defendant no longer had domicile in Switzerland.
C/29498/2018 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Security for Appeal Costs of Foreign Appellant
This article was the basis for finding the request for security for costs admissible.
C/20324/2023 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 let. d CPC)
Security for Costs in Unfair Competition Claim Denied Despite Financial Distress Allegations
The court rejected the request for security for costs because the conditions set out in this general clause were not met.
C/6552/2013 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 let. a CPC)
Irish Company Ordered to Post Security for Appeal Costs
Cited as the legal basis for requiring a party without domicile or seat in Switzerland to provide security for costs.
C/8099/2022 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 let. a CPC)
Respondent Ordered to Provide Security for Costs Despite Hague Convention Claim
The court ordered the defendant to provide security for costs based on the applicant's lack of established domicile in Switzerland.
C/8099/2022 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 let. d CPC)
Respondent Ordered to Provide Security for Costs Despite Hague Convention Claim
The court considered that the unknown domicile of the defendant created a considerable risk that costs would not be paid.
C/14053/2021 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Appellant's Obligation to Post Security for Costs Despite Claim of Spanish Domicile
The court used this article as the primary legal basis for granting the request for security for costs based on the appellant not having domicile in Switzerland.
C/4633/2022 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 let. a CPC)
Security for Costs for Foreign Appellant Owning Local Property
The underlying legal basis for ordering the security for costs, although not explicitly repeated in the final operative part, is linked to the main procedural action ordered.