Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 94 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Widerklage

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 7. Titel: Streitwert
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 94 ZPO · Widerklage

Stehen sich Klage und Widerklage gegenüber, so bestimmt sich der Streitwert nach dem höheren Rechtsbegehren.

Zur Bestimmung der Prozesskosten werden die Streitwerte zusammengerechnet, sofern sich Klage und Widerklage nicht gegenseitig ausschliessen.

Ist die Hauptklage eine Teilklage, werden die Prozesskosten ausschliesslich auf der Grundlage des Streitwerts der Hauptklage berechnet.

← Art. 93 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 94a ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (441)

MG180014.L · zh (Art. 94 ZPO)
Landlord's Duty to Accept Early Property Return and Burden of Proof for Damages
Cited for determining the value of proceedings and the calculation of procedural costs when main claims and counterclaims do not exclude each other.
ZKREK.2000.137 · so (§ 94 ZPO)
Scope of Defendant's Advance Cost Obligation and Evidentiary Sanctions
The provision was used to determine the scope of the defendant's liability for cost advances and the applicable sanctions in case of non-payment.
ZZ.2000.8 · so (§ 94 ZPO)
Divorce Proceeding Cost Deposit Default and Right to Cure
This provision is explicitly cited in the summary paragraph describing the legal principle applied regarding the payment of cost advances in divorce proceedings.
ZZ.1995.8 · so (§ 94 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Co-Debtors' Security Deposit Requirement Upheld in Debt Annulment Action
This provision establishes the obligation for each party to advance court costs for all procedural actions requested, which was the central issue regarding the timing and scope of the required deposit.
ZZ.1995.8 · so (§ 94 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Co-Debtors' Security Deposit Requirement Upheld in Debt Annulment Action
This paragraph was cited analogously to justify applying the sanction (dismissal of the action) for non-payment of the advance, even though the initial request only covered preliminary steps.
ZZ.1982.2 · so (§ 94 Abs. 4 ZPO)
Appealability of Pre-Sanction Procedural Orders Regarding Cost Advance Payment
This provision governs the admissibility of an appeal against the imposition of a security for costs and the associated threat of dismissal.
HOR.2024.23 · ag (Art. 94 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Cardboard Buyer Must Pay for Accepted Goods Due to Lack of Timely Defect Notification
This provision dictates how to combine claim and counterclaim values for the calculation of procedural costs.
MH250006.L.Z3 · zh (Art. 94 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Counterclaim Cost Advance Calculation Post-2025 Civil Procedure Code Revision
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the non-aggregation of the values in dispute for determining procedural costs when claims exclude each other, although not directly cited in the final operative orders regarding the decision itself.
Z1 2024 12 · zg (Art. 94 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Share Purchase Price Dispute Based on Alleged Misrepresentation
Applied to aggregate the claim and counterclaim values for determining the procedural costs.
C/10739/2023 · ge (Art. 94 al. 1, 308 al. 2; art. 319 let. a CPC)
Component Manufacturer's Color Defect and Contract Termination
Cited to establish the admissibility of the recourse based on the value in dispute before the lower court.
NP250009 · zh (Art. 94 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appeal Dismissed: Parking Rights and Attorney Fees Correction Upheld
Cited in reasoning to establish the dispute value for the appeal.
KV.Z.2023.1 · sg (Art. 94 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Claimant v. Health Insurer on Sickness Benefits and Business Activity
Cited in the reasoning regarding the calculation of the litigation value, which affects cost allocation.
Z1 2024 23 · zg (Art. 94 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Executive Commission Dispute and Unsubstantiated Expenditure Counterclaim
Applied in determining the total amount in dispute for cost allocation purposes in the first instance.
C1 22 134 · vs (Art. 94 al. 2 CPC)
Subcontractor Flooring Impregnation Dispute
Cited in the context of calculating the fees in the second instance based on the addition of the values in dispute for the main and counterclaim.
C/26570/2023 · ge (art. 94, 104 al. 1, 105, 106 al. 1 et art. 107 al. 1 let. c CPC)
Child Support Award Modification After Separation
Cited as the basis for distributing the appeal costs between the parties in family law matters.