Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 82 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Verfahren

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 5. Titel: Die Parteien und die Beteiligung Dritter; 5. Kapitel: Streitverkündung
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 82 ZPO · Verfahren

Die Zulassung der Streitverkündungsklage ist mit der Klageantwort oder mit der Replik im Hauptprozess zu beantragen. Die Rechtsbegehren, welche die streitverkündende Partei gegen die streitberufene Person zu stellen gedenkt, sind zu nennen und kurz zu begründen. Sie sind nicht zu beziffern, wenn sie dieselbe Leistung betreffen, zu der die streitverkündende Partei ihrerseits im Hauptverfahren verpflichtet wird.

Das Gericht gibt der Gegenpartei sowie der streitberufenen Person Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme.

Wird die Streitverkündungsklage zugelassen, so bestimmt das Gericht Zeitpunkt und Umfang des betreffenden Schriftenwechsels; Artikel 125 bleibt vorbehalten.

Der Entscheid über die Zulassung der Klage ist mit Beschwerde anfechtbar.

← Art. 81 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 83 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (120)

BGE 147 III 166 (Art. 82 al. 1, 2e phrase, CPC)
Third-party joinder application inadmissible for failure to specify per-defendant quantified claims, as global conclusions lacking individualized object of dispute fail to satisfy Article 82(1)(2) CPC.
Basis for declaring the application for leave to bring a third-party claim inadmissible because the conclusions and grounds did not satisfy the requirement to define each object of the dispute.
100 2017 209 · be (Art. 82 ZPO)
Taxpayer's Attempt to Cancel Subsequent Real Estate Gains Tax Demand Denied Due to Stringent Claim Requirements
Cited in the dispositive (Order 3) concerning the reservation for the paying parties' liability to reimburse costs to the Canton.
RBOG.2009.Nr.28 · tg (§ 82 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Indigent Litigant's Liability for Opposing Counsel Fees Despite Free Legal Aid
Cited by the lower court, although its application was disputed, regarding the awarding of party compensation against the appellant.
RBOG.2008.Nr.35 · tg (§ 82 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Denial of Free Legal Aid for Protection of Marital Relations Based on Prior Withdrawal of Application
Cited as the provision governing the requirement that proceedings must not appear hopeless for granting legal aid (unentgeltliche Prozessführung).
ZZ.1993.6 · so (§ 82 ZPO)
Landlord Rent Increase Appeal Deadline Commenced by Cantonal Procedural Law
This procedural rule was used to establish that deadlines start running the day after the decision is opened.
ZZ.1982.31 · so (Art. 82 ZPO)
Attorney Mail Withholding Causes Untimely Appeal
This procedural rule is explicitly cited in the heading alongside § 67 VRG, indicating the procedural context leading to the decision.
C/5267/2022 · ge (art. 82 al. 2 CPC)
Appeal in Intervention Admissibility Based on Alternative Claims and Connection to Primary Debt Claim
Cited to describe the procedural step where the court hears the parties before ruling on admissibility.
C/5267/2022 · ge (art. 82 al. 3 CPC)
Appeal in Intervention Admissibility Based on Alternative Claims and Connection to Primary Debt Claim
Cited in relation to the second stage of the procedure if the third-party notice is admitted.
C/5267/2022 · ge (art. 82 al. 4 CPC)
Appeal in Intervention Admissibility Based on Alternative Claims and Connection to Primary Debt Claim
Used to confirm the admissibility of the appeal against the decision refusing the third-party notice.
CPEN.2024.76 · ne (Art. 82 CPC)
Hip Prosthesis Intervention Appeal Dismissed in Conciliation Proceedings
The court ruled on the admissibility of the third-party joinder application based on this article, which was cited in the context of the appealable decision.
MH250001.Z3 · zh (Art. 82 Abs. 4 ZPO)
Tenancy Court Jurisdiction for Post-2025 Lawsuits and Third-Party Claims
Cited to confirm that the decision on the admissibility of the claim for intervention is a procedural ruling subject to appeal.
C/14935/2022 · ge (art. 82 al. 4 CPC)
Individual Commission Claim vs. Corporation; Corporation's Third-Party Advisory Claim Dismissed
The court referenced the conditions under which the decision refusing the third-party appeal is subject to a limited appeal on points of law.
C/12661/2021 · ge (art. 82 al. 1 CPC)
Architect's Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Third-Party Claim Against Insurers for Failure to Advise on Policy Limits
Cited in the context of admitting the third-party joinder (appel en cause) which is the core decision on the merits of the appeal.
C1 23 104 · vs (art. 82 al. 1 2e phr. CPC)
Construction Defect Litigation: Insufficient Pleading of Duty Breach and Causation
Cited in the reasoning (consid. 9.2) regarding the duty of the call-in appellant to state and substantiate conclusions against the called party.
C3 24 13 · vs (art. 82 al. 4 CPC)
School Owner Joinder of Architects in Contractor Payment Dispute Upheld
Cited to confirm that the decision on the admissibility of the joinder in the cause is subject to a limited appeal.