272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 74 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Grundsatz
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 5. Titel: Die Parteien und die Beteiligung Dritter; 4. Kapitel: Intervention
Art. 74 ZPO · Grundsatz
Wer ein rechtliches Interesse glaubhaft macht, dass eine rechtshängige Streitigkeit zugunsten der einen Partei entschieden werde, kann im Prozess jederzeit als Nebenpartei intervenieren und zu diesem Zweck beim Gericht ein Interventionsgesuch stellen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (105)
C/18825/2024 · ge (art. 74 CPC)
Shareholder Deadlock and Extraordinary General Meeting Order Confirmation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of accessory intervention, but not explicitly included in the final operative clauses.
PF250029 · zh (Art. 74 ZPO)
Individuals Denied Co-Litigant Status in Eviction Appeal
Mentioned in the reasoning as a general requirement for intervention (legal interest), but not directly applied in the dispositive orders.
HE240209 · zh (Art. 74 ZPO)
Construction Lien Provisional Entry Dismissal Due to Insufficient Substantiation of Object-Specificity and Timely Completion Notice
Applied to admit the third party (C._____ AG) as an intervener because it established a legal interest in the outcome of the dispute.
C1 23 104 · vs (art. 74 ss CPC)
Construction Defect Litigation: Insufficient Pleading of Duty Breach and Causation
Cited in the historical description (Letter B) regarding the accessory intervention, but not in the final dispositive orders (1-4) of the appeal judgment.
C/12541/2023 · ge (Art. 74 CPC)
Usufructuary's Appeal of Denied Accessory Intervention in Dividend Injunction Proceedings
The court analyzed the conditions for accessory intervention, which is governed by this article, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
C/14373/2022 · ge (art. 74 CPC)
Accessory Intervention Denial in Lease Annulment Case
The appeal was rejected because the intervention was inadmissible under this article, as the appellant failed to demonstrate a legitimate legal interest.
C/6376/2022 · ge (art. 74 CPC)
Appellant's Accessory Intervention Denied in Lease Termination Dispute
The appeal was rejected because the appellant failed to demonstrate a plausible legal interest for intervention as required by this article.
2023.08.08.zr.5.rm.0 · bl (Art. 74 ZPO)
Shareholder's Right to Intervene in General Meeting Dispute
The main ground for the decision was that the conditions for intervention as a secondary party were met.
410.23.140 · bl (Art. 74 ZPO)
Shareholder's Right to Intervene in General Meeting Resolution Disputes
Cited as the basis for allowing intervention in legal proceedings when a party has a legal interest.
6.2023.ROU · vd (art. 74 CPC)
Accessory Intervention Denied in Unfair Competition Case Due to Lack of Direct Legal Interest
The accessory intervention request was rejected because the conditions of this article regarding the applicant's legal interest were not met.
HC.2022.571 · vd (Art. 74 CPC)
Corporate Entity Appeal Regarding Blocked Account in Divorce Proceedings
Cited in the introductory section of the decision, although the final order rejects the appeal based on procedural grounds and cost allocation rules cited later.
C/29252/2018 · ge (art. 74 CPC)
Heirs' Right to Intervene in Debt Release Action Upheld
This provision regulated the admissibility of the accessory intervention, which was the core issue decided by confirming the lower court's decision.
HE220011 · zh (Art. 74 ZPO)
Provisional Construction Lien Upheld Despite Weak Substantiation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for intervention.
C1 21 208 · vs (Art. 74 ZPO)
Plaintiff's Appeal Regarding Water Damage Dismissed for Insufficient Specificity
Cited in the reasoning, allowing the interpleaded parties to oppose the main claim in the appeal proceedings.
BE.2021.50.52.55 · sg (Art. 74 ZPO)
Denial of Third-Party Intervention in Conciliation Upheld Due to Lack of Distinct Legal Interest
Cited as the primary legal basis for the requirement of a legal interest for admitting third-party intervention, which was ultimately found not to be met by the applicant.