272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 43 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Kraftloserklärung von Wertpapieren und Versicherungspolicen; Zahlungsverbot
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 2. Titel: Zuständigkeit der Gerichte und Ausstand; 2. Kapitel: Örtliche Zuständigkeit
Art. 43 ZPO · Kraftloserklärung von Wertpapieren und Versicherungspolicen; Zahlungsverbot
Für die Kraftloserklärung von Beteiligungspapieren ist das Gericht am Sitz der Gesellschaft zwingend zuständig.
Für die Kraftloserklärung von Grundpfandtiteln ist das Gericht an dem Ort zwingend zuständig, an dem das Grundstück im Grundbuch aufgenommen ist.
Für die Kraftloserklärung der übrigen Wertpapiere und der Versicherungspolicen ist das Gericht am Wohnsitz oder Sitz der Schuldnerin oder des Schuldners zwingend zuständig.
Für Zahlungsverbote aus Wechsel und Check und für deren Kraftloserklärung ist das Gericht am Zahlungsort zwingend zuständig.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (50)
ZZ.1998.12 · so (§ 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Beneficiary Lacks Standing to Appeal Foundation Nullity Judgment
Cited to determine that the petitioner could only have qualified for dependent ancillary intervention in the original proceedings.
ZZ.1998.12 · so (§ 43 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Beneficiary Lacks Standing to Appeal Foundation Nullity Judgment
Cited to contrast the conditions for independent ancillary intervention with the petitioner's situation.
HG240022 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Shareholder Squeeze-Out Upheld, Share Options Included
This article is referenced to confirm the general jurisdiction of the court.
ZKEIV.2023.10 · so (Art. 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Share Nullification Following Majority Takeover
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction based on the company's seat.
HG150046 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Squeeze-Out Valuation of Registered Shares
Cited to establish the court's local jurisdiction, which is a procedural prerequisite for issuing any order.
ZK1 2009 6 · gr (Art. 43 ZPO)
Spousal Support After Divorce in Life-Shaping Marriage
Mentioned regarding the procedural jurisdiction for granting legal aid during the appeal.
ZK2 2009 23 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 5 ZPO)
Appellant v. Respondent on Free Legal Aid Eligibility
Cited as the basis for the possibility to revisit the granting of legal aid if financial circumstances change during the main proceedings.
ZK2 2009 5 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Attorney Fee Compensation Following Dismissal of Labor Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to explain why the request for legal aid in the appeal procedure was dismissed (insufficient justification provided).
ERZ 2009 54 · gr (Art. 43 ZPO)
Applicant Denied Free Legal Aid Due to Accessible Assets and Sufficient Income Surplus
Cited in the context of procedural deficiencies leading to the rejection of the request.
PZ 2008 109 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Free Legal Aid and Allocation of Costs
The petition for legal aid was dismissed because the applicant failed to adequately substantiate her financial situation as required by this article.
PZ 2008 109 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Free Legal Aid and Allocation of Costs
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the judge's power to request further documentation, which is linked to the dismissal based on Art. 43 Abs. 1 ZPO.
AC.2005.0180 · vd (Art. 43 al. 2 CPC)
Property Owners v. Commune on Wastewater System Adaptation Obligation
Cited in the reasoning for the Tribunal taking jurisdiction after the original tribunal was recused, implying its application via Art. 6 ROTN, which is the procedural basis applied by the Neutral Tribunal.
PZ 2006 180 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 5 ZPO)
Spousal Support Reduction Appeal Costs and Free Legal Aid Eligibility
Cited in relation to the provisional granting of free legal representation, subject to revocation.
AA060127 · zh (§ 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Inadmissibility of Appeal Regarding Debt Collection Judgment Threshold
This provision was cited in the reasoning to establish that the decision of the court of first instance was subject only to a cassation appeal at the cantonal level.
ZB 2006 17 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Legal Aid Extension for Divorce Decree Modification Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement to file the application and provide documents, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (Order 1), so it is excluded.