Art. 42 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Fusionen, Spaltungen, Umwandlungen und Vermögensübertragungen

ZZ.1998.12 · so (§ 42 ZPO)

Beneficiary Lacks Standing to Appeal Foundation Nullity Judgment

Cited regarding the necessary procedure for filing an intervention request, which was not done by the appellant.

LA170012 · zh (Art. 42 ZPO)

Employment Claims Jurisdiction Dispute Under Lugano Convention

The appellant's request for disqualification against the lower court judges was assessed under this article, resulting in its rejection.

101 2015 119 · fr (Art. 42 ss CPC/FR)

Appellants' Untimely Recusal Request Upheld in Construction Dispute

Mentioned as part of the legal framework governing recusal that does not provide an exception to reserving costs.

ZK2 2009 66 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Appeal of Legal Aid Denial Based on Expense Calculation

Cited as the cumulative condition required for granting free legal aid (poverty and non-frivolous/non-hopeless proceedings).

10.2009.8 · ti (art. 42 CPC)

Investors v. Insurer and Agent: Improper Joinder and Jurisdictional Transfer

Cited in the reasoning regarding joinder of parties, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive).

ZK2 2009 23 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 1 und 2 ZPO)

Appellant v. Respondent on Free Legal Aid Eligibility

Cited as the general cumulative prerequisites (poverty and non-frivolity/non-hopelessness) for granting free legal aid, which the court ultimately found to be met.

ERZ 2009 141 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 2 ZPO)

Tenants' Appeal of Eviction for Unpaid Utility Surcharge Arrears Dismissed

Used to reject the request for free legal aid because the appeal was clearly unfounded.

ERZ 2009 141 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 2 ZPO)

Tenants' Failed Arbitration Appeal Bars Challenge to Eviction for Past-Due Surcharge

Used to reject the request for free legal aid because the appeal was obviously unfounded.

ZK2 2009 19 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 2 ZPO)

Denial of Free Legal Aid Based on Frivolous Appeal of Procedural Ruling

The court correctly dismissed the application for free legal aid based on this provision because the appeal was deemed obviously devoid of prospect of success.

ZK2 2009 5 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 2 ZPO)

Attorney Fee Compensation Following Dismissal of Labor Dispute

Cited in the reasoning when discussing that the initial legal aid should not have been granted because the case was prospectively hopeless due to a procedural error.

ERZ 2009 54 · gr (Art. 42 Abs.1 ZPO)

Applicant Denied Free Legal Aid Due to Accessible Assets and Sufficient Income Surplus

The general requirement for granting legal aid (poverty and non-frivolity of the case) which was evaluated and found not to be met.

ERZ 2009 54 · gr (Art. 42 Abs.1 ZPO)

Denial of Free Legal Aid Based on Financial Capacity and Asset Equity

The request for free legal aid was rejected because the cumulative requirements (no indigence and non-frivolous/non-hopeless proceedings) were not met.

08.09.02 · ur (Art. 42 ZPO)

Multiple Legal Rulings on Procedural Rules, Limitation Periods, Spousal Support, Employment Contracts, Public Procurement, and Judicial Review

Cited in the reasoning regarding the formation of necessary co-litigation (notwendige Streitgenossenschaft), although the primary application appears to be under Art. 116 lit. a ZPO for the substantive decision on security.

ZB 2008 22 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 5 ZPO)

Legal Aid Eligibility Based on Ceased Spousal Support and Timeframe for Financing

Cited in the reasoning when discussing that free legal aid can be revoked if the prerequisites cease to exist during the proceedings.

ZB 2008 22 · gr (Art. 42 ZPO)

Legal Aid Eligibility Based on Ceased Spousal Support and Timeframe for Financing

Cited as the core legal provision defining the material requirements (need and lack of obvious vexatiousness/hopelessness) for granting free legal aid.