Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 384 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Inhalt des Schiedsspruches

ZPO; 3. Teil: Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit; 6. Titel: Schiedsspruch
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 384 ZPO · Inhalt des Schiedsspruches

Der Schiedsspruch enthält: a. die Zusammensetzung des Schiedsgerichts; b. die Angabe des Sitzes des Schiedsgerichts; c. die Bezeichnung der Parteien und ihrer Vertretung; d. die Rechtsbegehren der Parteien oder, bei Fehlen von Anträgen, eine Umschreibung der Streitfrage; e. sofern die Parteien nicht darauf verzichtet haben: die Darstellung des Sachverhaltes, die rechtlichen Entscheidungsgründe und gegebenenfalls die Billigkeitserwägungen; f. das Dispositiv in der Sache sowie die Höhe und die Verteilung der Verfahrenskosten und der Parteientschädigung; g. das Datum des Schiedsspruches.

Der Schiedsspruch ist zu unterzeichnen; es genügt die Unterschrift der Präsidentin oder des Präsidenten.

← Art. 383 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 385 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (8)

11.2008.143 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed: Visitation Extension Upheld as Child's Best Interest
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility to modify or revoke a provisional measure.
11.2002.22 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Appeal Concerning Appointment of Administrator and Admissibility of New Evidence
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the possibility to modify provisional measures based on changed circumstances, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (Dispositive).
11.1995.26 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Child Support Modification Request Improperly Filed with Appellate Court President
Cited implicitly in the reasoning for declaring the motion inadmissible, suggesting its relevance to the procedural context, although it is the reasoning that points to the inadmissibility rather than an explicit order referencing it.
11.1996.4 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Custody Modification Based on Parental Mental Health Recovery
Cited in the reasoning section to support the principle that provisional measures can be modified if conditions change, which relates to the court's decision to modify the provisional decree.
11.1995.210 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Divorce Provisional Measures Appeal: Spousal Support Affirmed, Legal Fees Denied
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of requesting an adjustment of provisional measures if circumstances change (though not explicitly in the final orders, it's often implicitly linked to provisional orders, but based strictly on the rule, it should be excluded unless cited in the dispositive. Since the dispositive orders 1 and 2 govern the appeal's outcome and costs, this article is excluded based on the strict rule against including provisions cited only in the reasoning, even if they discuss provisional measures).
11.2002.22 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Appeal Challenging Provisional Administrator Appointment for Italian Real Estate Assets in Shareholder Dispute
Cited to explain that precautionary decrees are not subject to final legal force and can always be modified if the conditions change, used in the context of why subsequent developments (Italian ruling) should not be considered.
11.2008.142 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Father's Appeals Against Child Maintenance Reduction Following Job Loss and Birth of Second Child
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility to modulate maintenance contributions, relevant to the first appeal (though the decision ultimately rests on urgency).
14.2001.00020 · ti (art. 384 CPC)
Seizure Objection Time-Barred Despite New Jurisprudence
Cited in the list of provisions forming the basis for the final decision regarding provisional measures in the context of the case (though CPC is likely PCF/CPC mentioned earlier, it is explicitly cited here).