272
ZPOCPC
CH
Art. 38 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Motorfahrzeug- und Fahrradunfälle
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 2. Titel: Zuständigkeit der Gerichte und Ausstand; 2. Kapitel: Örtliche Zuständigkeit
Art. 38 ZPO · Motorfahrzeug- und Fahrradunfälle
Für Klagen aus Motorfahrzeug- und Fahrradunfällen ist das Gericht am Wohnsitz oder Sitz der beklagten Partei oder am Unfallort zuständig.
Für Klagen gegen das nationale Versicherungsbüro (Art. 74 des Strassenverkehrsgesetzes vom 19. Dez. 1958 ; SVG) oder gegen den nationalen Garantiefonds (Art. 76 SVG) ist zusätzlich das Gericht am Ort einer Zweigniederlassung dieser Einrichtungen zuständig.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (39)
9.2021.4 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 2 CPC/TI)
Protection Authority Representative Appointment Overturned Due to Lack of Expert Assessment
Cited in the reasoning concerning the procedural basis for the initial request made by the lower court.
HG150169 · zh (Art. 38 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Traffic Accident Injury Claim Dismissed as Time-Barred
Basis for confirming the local and material jurisdiction of the Commercial Court, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders, it confirms the court's authority to rule.
AbR.1994.95.Nr.10 · ow (Art. 38 ZPO)
Unemployment Fund's Right to Recover Benefits from Employer Upheld
This provision on the joinder of actions was referenced in the context of deciding whether the two proceedings should be consolidated.
C/19134/2009 · ge (art. 38 al. 1, let. c, ch. 2 CPC)
Rent Increase Apportionment Remand Due to New Tenant Objections
Cited to justify the referral of the case back to the lower court for supplementary investigation and new decision.
Pdt.TC.2010.39 · vd (art. 38 al. 4 CPC)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing in Paternity Cost Dispute
This article was cited to determine the correct end date of the appeal deadline.
Pron.2010.36 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 et 4 CPC)
Lessee's Appeal of Eviction Inadmissible Due to Untimely Filing
Cited in the reasoning to calculate the expiry date of the original appeal deadline.
Pdt.TC.2010.17 · vd (Art. 38 al. 4 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Partial Success and Cost Allocation
Cited to determine the deadline for the appeal, which validates the procedural path leading to the decision.
ML.2009.121 · vd (art. 38 al. 4 CPC)
Former Employee v. Employer Regarding Unpaid Salary vs. Insurance Indemnity During Sick Leave
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the application of procedural rules.
12.2004.169 · ti (art. 38 CPC)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Appellant's Dissolution Post-Bankruptcy
Cited implicitly via commentary (Cocchi/Trezzini) concerning the consequences of the lack of legal personality for proceedings and costs.
ZB 2007 2 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Architectural Fee Claim Jurisdictional Ruling Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the charging of court costs, but NOT cited in the final dispositive orders (1-4) of this specific decision, hence it is excluded based on the rules.
VZ.2006.54 · sg (Art. 38 ZPO)
Condominium Owners' Association Fee Collection Correction Upheld
Cited in the context of when correction of the party designation is permissible when it is obviously incorrect or inaccurate.
VZ.2006.54 · sg (Art. 38 ZPO)
Condominium Association Collection Suit Party Substitution Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's power to correct obviously inaccurate or imprecise party designations.
ZF 2006 21 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Contractor v. Subcontractor: Jurisdictional Challenge Based on Missed Security Deposit Deadline
Cited concerning the obligation of the defendant to pay the cost deposit.
ZF 2006 21 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Contractor v. Subcontractor: Jurisdictional Challenge Based on Missed Security Deposit Deadline
Cited concerning the obligation of the court to act only once the cost deposit is paid, impacting the effectiveness of pre-deposit filings.
AA050194 · zh (§ 38 ZPO)
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Substantiate Financial Need for Legal Aid
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure when there is no power of attorney, supporting the issue of representation that contributed to the rejection of the appeal in order 2.