272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 379 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Sicherstellung der Parteientschädigung
ZPO; 3. Teil: Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit; 5. Titel: Das Schiedsverfahren
Art. 379 ZPO · Sicherstellung der Parteientschädigung
Erscheint die klagende Partei zahlungsunfähig, so kann das Schiedsgericht auf Antrag der beklagten Partei verfügen, dass deren mutmassliche Parteientschädigung innert bestimmter Frist sicherzustellen ist. Für die beklagte Partei gilt Artikel 378 Absatz 2 sinngemäss.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (32)
Arr.t.2011.790 · vd (art. 379 ss CPC)
Curatorship vs. Tutelage for Capacity and Mental Health
Procedural framework under which the appeal proceedings regarding the guardianship procedure are governed.
14.2002.91 · ti (Art. 379 cpv. 2 CPC)
Untimely Challenge to Ex Parte Share Blocking Order
The application of December 16, 2002/February 7, 2003, made by ___ is declared inadmissible because it is manifestly late according to this provision.
14.2002.91 · ti (Art. 379 cpv. 2 CPC)
Untimely Challenge to Ex Parte Share Blocking Order
This procedural provision is cited regarding the deadline for challenging precautionary measures taken without adversarial proceedings.
11.2008.23 · ti (art. 379 cpv. 5 CPC)
Liechtenstein Foundation Granted Conservatory Measures to Maintain Corporate Standing of Panamanian/Argentine Subsidiaries
Cited implicitly in reasoning (point 6b) regarding the rules for producing documents in summary proceedings.
11.2008.143 · ti (art. 379 cpv. 5 CPC)
Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed: Visitation Extension Upheld as Child's Best Interest
Cited in the reasoning to describe the summary nature of provisional measures.
Arr.t.2009.23 · vd (Art. 379 CPC)
Appeal of Refusal to Initiate Civil Interdiction Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the denunciation was non-compliant with legal requirements for initiating the guardianship procedure.
11.2008.98 · ti (art. 126 combinato con l'art. 379 cpv. 3 CPC)
Appeal Inadmissibility and Reclassification of Custody Modification Motion
These articles were cited in the reasoning to justify the referral of the act back to the lower court (order 2) to examine if it meets the requirements for initiating adversarial proceedings regarding the provisional modification.
11.2008.47 · ti (art. 379 cpv. 2 CPC)
Father's Appeal on Provisional Visitation Rights Inadmissible
Cited in the reasoning to explain the correct remedy (request for modification) for decisions made without contradictory proceedings.
CCC.2006.163 · ne (Art. 379 CPC)
Creditor Provisional Payment Order Lifting Upheld Despite Signatory Authority Dispute
Cited implicitly by referring to the requirement to provide a written response in the summary mainlevée procedure, which is an element supporting the dismissal of the appeal.
11.2004.21 · ti (art. 379 cpv. 2 CPC)
Property Owner's Appeal of Provisional Access Measure Inadmissible Due to Failure to Exhaust Adversarial Review
The text discusses this article regarding the right to request a contradictory hearing after a decision without it, relevant to the inadmissibility finding.
11.2003.91 · ti (art. 379 cpv. 3 CPC)
Appeal Inadmissibility in Spousal Support Attachment Modification
Cited in conjunction with Art. 126 CPC to justify sending the appeal back to the lower court to be treated as a request for revocation.
11.2002.11 · ti (art. 126 combinato con l'art. 379 cpv. 3 CPC)
Appealability of Provisional Measures Without Prior Adversarial Hearing
Used as the basis for transmitting the case back to the lower court to treat the appeal as a motion for revocation and examine the provisional measure request.
11.2000.110 · ti (art. 379 cpv. 3 CPC)
Garnishment Modification Appeal Inadmissible Pending Revocation Proceedings
The appeal was referred to the lower court to be processed as a revocation request, as per this provision combined with Art. 126 CPC.
11.2000.18 · ti (Art. 379 cpv. 2 CPC)
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Lack of Adversarial Process in Precautionary Measure Ruling
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the right to request revocation or modification of measures ordered without a hearing.
11.1998.51 · ti (art. 379 cpv. 2 CPC)
Appeal Inadmissible: Provisional Support Withholding Order Not Ripe for Review Before Final Hearing
Cited in the reasoning regarding the recourse available against provisional measures ordered without a hearing (revocation application).