272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 377 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Verrechnung und Widerklage
ZPO; 3. Teil: Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit; 5. Titel: Das Schiedsverfahren
Art. 377 ZPO · Verrechnung und Widerklage
Erhebt eine Partei die Verrechnungseinrede, so kann das Schiedsgericht die Einrede beurteilen, unabhängig davon, ob die zur Verrechnung gestellte Forderung unter die Schiedsvereinbarung fällt oder ob für sie eine andere Schiedsvereinbarung oder eine Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung besteht.
Eine Widerklage ist zulässig, wenn sie eine Streitsache betrifft, die unter eine übereinstimmende Schiedsvereinbarung der Parteien fällt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
BGE 84 I 39 (§ 377 zürch. ZPO)
Foreign arbitral award enforcement refused under public policy due to arbitral tribunal composition and state economy differences.
Procedural basis for the cantonal court's decision on the request for a declaration of enforceability of the arbitral award.
C/1740/2018 · ge (art. 377 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal on Jurisdiction and Right to be Heard Regarding Arbitrable Counterclaim
Cited in the reasoning section when discussing the competence of the arbitral tribunal regarding set-off claims.
12.2008.73 · ti (art. 377 CPC)
Inadmissibility of Direct Interim Relief Application to Appellate Court
The court declared the precautionary request inadmissible because it was directly filed with the Court of Appeal, citing this article regarding the competence for precautionary measures in appeal proceedings.
11.2004.9 · ti (art. 377 cpv. 2 CPC)
Denial of Provisional Spousal Maintenance Suspension Pending Divorce Appeal
The court determined that the conditions for applying this article regarding the President's power to issue provisional measures in appeal cases were not met, leading to the inadmissibility ruling.
11.2003.164 · ti (art. 377 cpv. 2 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Marital Protection Measures and Visitation Restrictions
Cited in the reasoning section as authority for the president's power to issue interim measures.
10.2002.10 · ti (Art. 4, Art. 377 cpv. 2 CPC)
Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Super-Provisional Measures Granted
Although Art. 377 cpv. 2 CPC is mentioned in the preliminary considerations regarding competence for provisional measures, it is not explicitly cited in the numbered dispositive orders (1-6).
10.2000.5 · ti (art. 303 e 377 cpv. 2 CPC)
Appellate Court Interpretation and Modification of Preliminary Injunction on Seized Counterfeit Clothing
Cited to establish the court's competence to judge the request for revision.
CCC.1999.7559 · ne (art.377 CPC)
Employee Wages After Voided Dismissal
Cited as the procedural rule governing how the claim is submitted in summary opposition proceedings.
11.1998.39 · ti (art. 377 cpv. 1 CPC)
Jurisdictional Transfer of Provisional Measure Modification Request
Cited to establish that the new motion based on new facts must first be examined by the Pretore.
CCC.1996.7180 · ne (art.377 CPC)
Enforceability of Judicial Settlement for Rent Arrears
Cited regarding the requirement for the request to be reasoned and supported by documents in summary procedure.
CCC.1995.6883 · ne (art.377 CPC)
Creditor v. Debtor: Opposition to Payment Order and Calculation of Amounts Due
Cited as the procedural rule requiring a motivated request with supporting documents in debt collection proceedings.
10.2000.5 · ti (art. 377 cpv. 2 CPC)
Interpretation and Revision of Precautionary Measure Seizure Order Regarding Trademark Infringement Likelihood
Cited as part of the combined rule establishing the competence of the Chamber to judge the revision request.
10.2002.10 · ti (art. 377 cpv. 2 CPC)
Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Preliminary Measures Against Store Operator
Cited in the preamble to establish jurisdiction regarding precautionary intervention.
12.2008.73 · ti (art. 377 CPC)
Corporate Dispute Interim Measures Admissibility Appeal
Cited in the final orders for deeming the urgent application inadmissible because it was improperly addressed to the Court of Appeal when jurisdiction belonged to the lower court.