272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 375 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Beweisabnahme und Mitwirkung des staatlichen Gerichts
ZPO; 3. Teil: Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit; 5. Titel: Das Schiedsverfahren
Art. 375 ZPO · Beweisabnahme und Mitwirkung des staatlichen Gerichts
Das Schiedsgericht nimmt die Beweise selber ab.
Ist für die Beweisabnahme oder für die Vornahme sonstiger Handlungen des Schiedsgerichts staatliche Rechtshilfe erforderlich, so kann das Schiedsgericht das nach Artikel 356 Absatz 2 zuständige staatliche Gericht um Mitwirkung ersuchen. Mit Zustimmung des Schiedsgerichts kann dies auch eine Partei tun.
Die Mitglieder des Schiedsgerichts können an den Verfahrenshandlungen des staatlichen Gerichts teilnehmen und Fragen stellen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (37)
30.2008.136 · ti (art. 375 bis CPC)
Appeal Against Parking Fine Allowed Due to Lack of Due Process and Insufficient Evidentiary Support
Cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, related to the procedural grounds (violation of the right to be heard) for annulling the decision.
30.2008.136 · ti (art. 375 ter CPC)
Appeal Against Parking Fine Allowed Due to Lack of Due Process and Insufficient Evidentiary Support
Cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, related to the merits of the case where the appeal was eventually accepted.
30.2007.118 · ti (art. 375 bis CPC)
Canton Parking Violation on School Property
The article establishing the procedure for prohibiting unauthorized parking on private land is cited in the preamble to the final orders.
30.2007.118 · ti (art. 375 ter CPC)
Canton Parking Violation on School Property
The article under which the initial infraction was reported is cited in the preamble to the final orders.
30.2006.337 · ti (art. 375bis e 375 ter CPC)
Employee Parking Fine Appeal Dismissed
These articles were cited as the legal basis for dismissing the appeal and confirming the contested decision regarding the unlawful use of private parking space.
30.2006.274 · ti (art. 375 bis, 375 ter CPC)
Parking Fine Overturned Due to Location Outside Private Property Boundary
The appeal was upheld, leading to the annulment of the decision which was based on these articles concerning the prohibition of illicit parking on private land.
30.2006.319 · ti (art. 375 bis, 375 ter CPC)
Parking Fine Annulled Due to Location on Public Road
These articles provided the substantive basis for the original administrative decision regarding illegal parking on private land, which the court ultimately annulled.
30.2005.353 · ti (art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC)
Parking on Private Property Appeal Dismissed
These articles were cited as the basis for confirming the contested decision, which upheld the fine for illicitly using private parking space.
30.2004.358 · ti (art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC)
Parking Fine Appeal Over Authorization on Private Property
The appeal was allowed and the decision was annulled, implicitly based on the analysis of these articles concerning illegal parking.
30.2004.380 · ti (art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC)
Appeal of Private Property Parking Fine for Waste Disposal
These articles, which regulated the initial fine, are cited in the preamble to the final orders, establishing the basis for the review, even though the decision ultimately annuls the measure taken under them.
30.2004.329 · ti (art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC)
Traffic Violation Appeal Regarding Parking on Private Property
These articles relating to the underlying offense were cited in the preamble to the orders ('per questi motivi, visti gli art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC...').
30.2004.330 · ti (art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC)
Parking Violation on Private Property Upheld Despite Lease Argument
These articles were cited in the concluding section justifying the decision to reject the appeal (which confirms the previous decision based on these articles).
30.2004.271 · ti (art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC)
Appeal of Parking Fine Based on Improper Notice Delivery
These articles concerning the prohibition of parking on private land were the legal basis cited when ruling on the appeal and confirming the original decision.
30.2004.291 · ti (art. 375 bis e 375 ter CPC)
Parking Violation on Private Property Upheld
These articles were cited in the preamble to the decision as the basis for the court's ruling to reject the appeal, confirming the original fine decision.
30.2004.169 · ti (art. 375 bis e ter CPC)
Illegal Parking Fine Appeal Dismissed
Cited in the preamble to the decision as part of the legal basis for the ruling, relating to the underlying offenses.