272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 363 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Offenlegungspflicht
ZPO; 3. Teil: Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit; 3. Titel: Bestellung des Schiedsgerichts
Art. 363 ZPO · Offenlegungspflicht
Eine Person, der ein Schiedsrichteramt angetragen wird, hat das Vorliegen von Umständen unverzüglich offenzulegen, die berechtigte Zweifel an ihrer Unabhängigkeit oder Unparteilichkeit wecken können.
Diese Pflicht bleibt während des ganzen Verfahrens bestehen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (26)
ZK2 2024 21 · gr (Art. 363 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appointment of Sole Arbitrator for Facade Construction Dispute
This provision outlines the duty of disclosure for potential arbitrators, a prerequisite checked before the appointment.
ZK2 2024 21 · gr (Art. 363 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Appointment of Sole Arbitrator for Facade Construction Dispute
This provision reiterates the continuing duty of disclosure during the proceedings, which was reviewed before the appointment.
11.2010.63 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Judge Recusal Following Criminal Complaint by Defendant
Cited by analogy concerning the holding of oral hearings for the recusal decision.
12.2009.152 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Appeal on Judicial Recusal Due to Criminal Complaints Filed Against Litigant
Cited analogously in the reasoning regarding potential oral hearings, not used in the dispositive.
12.2009.151 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Recusal of Judge Due to Criminal Complaints Against Opponent
This provision was cited analogously to determine procedural consequences (the need for an oral hearing, which was waived).
12.2009.31 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Judge's Criminal Prosecution of Party Invalidates Self-Recusal in Dispute Case
Cited by analogy in the reasoning, but not in the dispositive orders.
11.2009.19 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Magistrate Recusal Following Criminal Complaint Against Litigant
This article was cited by analogy concerning the requirement for a hearing in the decision-making process.
12.2008.87 · ti (art. 363 cpv. 2 CPC)
Recusal Due to Shared Administrator and Prior Impartiality Concerns
This procedural rule is mentioned in the reasoning to explain the standard procedure, but it does not appear in the dispositive orders.
12.2008.91 · ti (art. 363 cpv. 2 CPC)
Recusal Upheld Due to Prior Successful Bias Challenges
Cited in paragraph 3 when describing the general implication of the contentious procedure for chamber consultations.
11.2002.78 · ti (art. 363 cpv. 1 CPC)
Recusal Denial for Alleged Judicial Bias and Procedural Disagreement
Cited regarding the requirement to cite parties to a discussion within a 'short term' in summary proceedings.
11.2001.84 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Father's Letter Regarding Custody Modification and Recusal of Judge and Secretary-Auditor
Cited by analogy in the reasoning regarding the procedure for the recusal decision.
11.2000.62 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Spousal and Child Support Provisional Measures Appeal Over Procedural Violations
Cited as part of the procedural violation leading to the annulment of the decision (failure to summon parties for discussion).
12.1998.219 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Invalid Auditor Appointment and Void Company Dissolution
Cited in the reasoning section as governing the procedure, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, therefore excluded.
11.1996.114 · ti (art. 363 CPC)
Appealability of Discovery Order in Divorce Proceedings
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the required procedure for contested chamber proceedings.
TA.1995.444 · ne (Art. 363 en corrélation avec l'art.354 CPC)
Attorney Fee Reduction in Uncontested Divorce Upheld
Cited to explain the general rule regarding oral judgment and written notification of the operative part in matrimonial cases decided by a single judge.