Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 352 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gerichtliche Beurteilung

ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Vollstreckung; 2. Kapitel: Vollstreckung öffentlicher Urkunden
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 352 ZPO · Gerichtliche Beurteilung

Die gerichtliche Beurteilung der geschuldeten Leistung bleibt in jedem Fall vorbehalten. Insbesondere kann die verpflichtete Partei jederzeit auf Feststellung klagen, dass der Anspruch nicht oder nicht mehr besteht oder gestundet ist.

← Art. 351 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 353 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (824)

10/2006/5 · sh (Art. 352 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Jurisdictional Requirements for Case Consolidation and Improper Implied Consent Finding
The appeal was partially granted based on this provision.
ZK 2010 219 · be (Art. 352 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Correction of Civil Status Entry under Article 42 SCC vs. Declaratory Action
Used to annul the previous decision and remand the case for a new trial based on procedural grounds.
ZK 2009 336 · be (Art. 352 ZPO)
Defective Creditor Designation in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning to justify remanding the case to the lower court for a new substantive review.
11.2010.57 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 1 CPC ticinese)
Spousal Support Obligation Termination and Cost Allocation Following Acquiescence to Original Demand
Cited in the reasoning section (Consid. 1) as the legal basis for recognizing the effect of acquiescence that terminates the litigation.
11.2010.57 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 2 CPC ticinese)
Spousal Support Obligation Termination and Cost Allocation Following Acquiescence to Original Demand
Cited in the reasoning section (Consid. 1) as the basis for taking note of acquiescence and removing the case from the roll.
11.2009.79 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 2 CPC)
Heirs v. Estate Liquidator: Settlement and Procedural Costs
Cited in the preamble to the decree as the basis for the decision regarding the withdrawal of the case due to transaction.
11.2008.106 · ti (art. 352 CPC ticinese)
Matrimonial Property Division Appeal Settled by Heirs
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the judgment recognizing the judicial settlement which terminated the appeal procedure.
11.2010.116 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 2 CPC ticinese)
Spousal Support Modification and Extraordinary Expenses Appeal Withdrawal
Cited in the reasoning for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal and striking the case from the rolls due to desistance, which forms the basis for the order in point 1.
11.2010.105 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 2 CPC ticinese)
Appellant's Withdrawal from Divorce Appeal After Partial Agreement
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for striking the appeal from the roll due to withdrawal (desistenza).
11.2009.201 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 2 CPC ticinese)
Appeal Regarding Spousal Maintenance Suppression Deemed Moot by Prior Retroactive Order
The first instance decision was annulled and the case struck from the roll based on this provision concerning the valid judgment of the case.
11.2008.116 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 1 CPC ticinese)
Servitude Claim Withdrawal and Cost Allocation
It is the legal basis used to acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal and strike the case from the roll due to desistance.
36.2011.48 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 1 CPC)
Insured v. Sickness Insurer: Dispute Over Pre- and Post-Operative Disability Thresholds
Cited in the reasoning to explain the effect of acquiescence (ending the dispute and having res judicata force) which underpins the partial rejection in order 1.
36.2011.48 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 2 CPC)
Insured v. Sickness Insurer: Dispute Over Pre- and Post-Operative Disability Thresholds
Cited in the reasoning regarding the judge's duty to acknowledge the parties' acquiescence and strike the case from the roll, which is the basis for order 1.
36.2011.48 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 3 CPC)
Insured v. Sickness Insurer: Dispute Over Pre- and Post-Operative Disability Thresholds
Cited in the reasoning to explain the conditions under which a case ended by acquiescence can be re-litigated, relevant context for the decision in order 1.
36.2011.48 · ti (art. 352 cpv. 4 CPC)
Insured v. Sickness Insurer: Dispute Over Pre- and Post-Operative Disability Thresholds
Cited in the reasoning regarding the parties' duty to notify the judge of settled disputes, providing context for the procedure leading to order 1.