272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 35 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Verzicht auf die gesetzlichen Gerichtsstände

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 2. Titel: Zuständigkeit der Gerichte und Ausstand; 2. Kapitel: Örtliche Zuständigkeit

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 35 ZPO · Verzicht auf die gesetzlichen Gerichtsstände

Auf die Gerichtsstände nach den Artikeln 32–34 können nicht zum Voraus oder durch Einlassung verzichten: a. die Konsumentin oder der Konsument; b. die Partei, die Wohn- oder Geschäftsräume gemietet oder gepachtet hat; c. bei landwirtschaftlichen Pachtverhältnissen: die pachtende Partei; d. die stellensuchende oder arbeitnehmende Partei.

Vorbehalten bleibt der Abschluss einer Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung nach Entstehung der Streitigkeit.

← Art. 34 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 36 ZPO →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (62)

BE.2024.20.EZO3 · sg (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a i.V.m. Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b ZPO)

Moving Services Contract: Consumer Jurisdiction vs. Forum Selection Clause

Basis for the court's decision not to enter into the claim due to mandatory consumer jurisdiction at the defendant's domicile, overriding any choice-of-court clause.

MJ230080 · zh (Art. 33 und 35 ZPO)

Tenant Water Damage Suit for Rent Reduction and Damages

Cited as the basis for the court's territorial and subject-matter jurisdiction.

ZVE.2024.12 · ag (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO)

Debt Collection Dispute: Lower Court Ruling Largely Upheld on Appeal

This provision states that a consumer cannot waive the partial mandatory jurisdiction in advance.

HOR.2023.64 · ag (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b ZPO)

Landlord v. Tenant: Unpaid Rent and Lease Termination Damages

Cited regarding the non-waivability of jurisdiction at the place where the property is located.

VV240003 · zh (Art. 35 ZPO)

Rental Dispute Transfer Dismissed as Moot Following Agreement

While not explicitly numbered in the dispositive, the underlying action of closing the case due to the matter becoming moot (Gegenstandslosigkeit) generally aligns with the principles governing the termination of proceedings under procedural law, implied by the declaration in Order 1.

HSU.2024.2 · ag (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b ZPO)

Tenant Eviction for Non-Payment of Rent

Cited to state that parties cannot waive the territorial jurisdiction in rental disputes.

HSU.2023.52 · ag (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b ZPO)

Landlord v. Commercial Tenant: Eviction for Non-Payment of Rent

Prohibits waiver of jurisdiction for residential and commercial leases.

ZKBES.2023.123 · so (Art. 35 ZPO)

Litigant's Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Show Legal Error in Procedural Rulings

Although not explicitly cited in the operative part, it is often the implied procedural basis for imposing costs in appeal proceedings when referring to the costs provision.

HSU.2023.12 · ag (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b ZPO)

Landlord v. Tenant (Unpaid Rent Eviction)

Cited to state that parties cannot waive territorial jurisdiction for business premises.

KK.2020.00014 · zh (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO)

Insurer Liable for Disability Benefits Following Relapse

Cited to establish that consumers cannot waive jurisdictional rules for consumer contracts in advance.

C/4535/2017 · ge (art. 35 al. 1 let. d CPC)

Labor Dispute: Salary Claims, 14th Salary, and Company Car Valuation Appeal

Cited to confirm that the worker cannot waive the mandatory forum choice provided by Art. 34 al. 1 CPC.

HC.2020.928 · vd (art. 35 al. 1 let. d CPC)

Employee Salary Dispute and Jurisdiction Appeal

This article addresses the non-waivable nature of the forums provided in Art. 34 CPC for employees, which was central to the jurisdiction challenge.

MG180039.L · zh (Art. 35 ZPO)

Tenant's Claim for Lock Change and VAT Refund Dismissed

Cited for the court's jurisdiction regarding rental disputes.

ZV.2019.7 · bs (Art. 35 ZPO)

Insurance Benefits Dispute Over Disability Transition Period

Cited to classify the jurisdiction under Art. 32 ZPO as partially mandatory, meaning the weaker party cannot waive it in advance.

CACIV.2019.72 · ne (Art. 35 al. 1 let. a CPC)

Appellant v. Seller (Used Vehicle Jurisdiction)

Cited in the reasoning section to explain why the contractual choice-of-forum clause was irrelevant due to the consumer protection rule of Art. 32 CPC.