272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 305 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Geltungsbereich

ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 8. Titel: Verfahren bei eingetragener Partnerschaft; 1. Kapitel: Angelegenheiten des summarischen Verfahrens

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 305 ZPO · Geltungsbereich

Das summarische Verfahren ist anwendbar für: a. die Festsetzung von Geldbeiträgen an den Unterhalt und Anweisung an die Schuldnerin oder den Schuldner (Art. 13 Abs. 2 und 3 des Partnerschaftsgesetzes vom 18. Juni 2004 , PartG); b. die Ermächtigung einer Partnerin oder eines Partners zur Verfügung über die gemeinsame Wohnung (Art. 14 Abs. 2 PartG); c. die Ausdehnung oder den Entzug der Vertretungsbefugnis einer Partnerin oder eines Partners für die Gemeinschaft (Art. 15 Abs. 2 Bst. a und 4 PartG); d. die Auskunftspflicht der Partnerin oder des Partners über Einkommen, Vermögen und Schulden (Art. 16 Abs. 2 PartG); e. die Festlegung, Anpassung oder Aufhebung der Geldbeiträge und die Regelung der Benützung der Wohnung und des Hausrats (Art. 17 Abs. 2 und 4 PartG); f. die Verpflichtung einer Partnerin oder eines Partners zur Mitwirkung bei der Aufnahme eines Inventars (Art. 20 Abs. 1 PartG); g. die Beschränkung der Verfügungsbefugnis einer Partnerin oder eines Partners über bestimmte Vermögenswerte (Art. 22 Abs. 1 PartG); h. die Einräumung von Fristen zur Begleichung von Schulden zwischen den Partnerinnen oder Partnern (Art. 23 Abs. 1 PartG).

← Art. 304 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 306 ZPO →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (25)

ZZ.1978.8 · so (§ 305 ZPO)

Admissibility of New Evidence in Appeals Against Cost Decisions

The court applied this provision to rule that new assertions and evidence are admissible in all appeals that are not directed against procedural rulings, which included the cost appeal in question.

2017.09.26.zr.1 · bl (Art. 305 ZPO)

Maintenance for Partner Who Reduced Work for Childcare Upheld, Albeit Adjusted

Specifies the summary procedure applicable in certain cases.

Arr.t.2010.1539 · vd (Art. 305 al. 2 CPC)

Father's Appeal of Supervised Visitation Order Due to Diabetic Episode and Failure to Hear Child

This procedural rule concerning the adjournment of a hearing when a party is prevented from appearing was implicitly cited as a basis for the need to re-hear the father.

242.II · vd (Art. 305 al. 4 CPC)

Child Maintenance Modification Hearing Postponement Costs Appeal Dismissed

This provision concerning the costs of adjournment due to a party's inability to proceed was used in the reasoning supporting the initial decision which the appeal challenged.

219.II · vd (Art. 305 al. 2 CPC)

Appeal Regarding Refusal to Postpone Property Partition Sale

The court implicitly ruled on the applicability of this provision regarding the adjournment of the hearing due to a major impediment, which served as the basis for rejecting the appeal.

100.2010.PHC · vd (art. 305 al. 1 CPC)

Plaintiff v. Co-Guarantors for Default on Credit Facility

Cited as the legal basis for proceeding to a default judgment because the defendants did not appear.

HC.2010.306 · vd (Art. 305 al. 1 CPC)

Defendant's Appeal of Default Judgment Denied Due to Failure to Arrange Accessible Attendance

This article concerning the conditions for declaring a party in default was cited in the reasoning leading to the rejection of the appeal.

HC.2010.306 · vd (Art. 305 al. 2 CPC)

Defendant's Appeal of Default Judgment Denied Due to Failure to Arrange Accessible Attendance

This article concerning the mandatory adjournment if a party is prevented from appearing was cited in the reasoning.

70.2010.FAB · vd (Art. 305 al. 1 CPC)

Debt Collection Opposition Lifted Due to Untimely Filing

Cited as a basis for deciding to proceed by default judgment against the plaintiff.

65.2010.DCA · vd (art. 305 al. 2 CPC)

Judgment by Default for Failure to Appear and Non-Payment of Costs in Intermediary Fee Dispute

Used to establish the grounds for proceeding by default judgment after the claimant failed to appear.

HC.2010.276 · vd (Art. 305 CPC)

Labor Default Judgment Overturned Due to Refusal to Proceed Without Counsel and Incomplete Instruction Phase

Cited as the applicable provision defining a case of default when a party refuses to proceed, which was central to the appellant's argument regarding his perceived default.

HC.2010.300 · vd (Art. 305 CPC)

Appeal Against Default Judgment for Film Equipment Rental Debt

This provision was cited in the introductory section concerning the general rules on default procedure applicable due to the appellant's absence.

HC.2010.168 · vd (Art. 305 al. 2 CPC)

Appeal Dismissed Affirming Default Judgment for Failure to Appear

This article was invoked by the appellant regarding the failure to postpone the hearing, although the appeal was ultimately rejected.

HC.2009.345 · vd (Art. 305 al. 1 CPC)

Appeal Regarding Default Judgment on Brokerage Fees and Maintenance Costs

Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions under which a party can be declared defaulted, which pertains to the grounds for the judgment by default being upheld.

101.2009.PHC · vd (art. 305 al. 1 CPC)

Default Judgment for Outstanding Loan Balances Based on Choice-of-Court Clauses

Cited as a legal basis for proceeding to a default judgment.