272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 300 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Kompetenzen der Vertretung
ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 7. Titel: Kinderbelange in familienrechtlichen Angelegenheiten; 1. Kapitel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Art. 300 ZPO · Kompetenzen der Vertretung
Die Vertretung des Kindes kann Anträge stellen und Rechtsmittel einlegen, soweit es um folgende Angelegenheiten geht: a. die Zuteilung der elterlichen Sorge; b. die Zuteilung der Obhut; c. wichtige Fragen des persönlichen Verkehrs; d. die Aufteilung der Betreuung; e. den Unterhaltsbeitrag; f. die Kindesschutzmassnahmen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (79)
ZKREK.2004.37 · so (§ 300 f. ZPO)
Divorce Proceedings Superseding Marital Protection Support Appeals
These articles define the appealability and scope of review for decisions made in marital protection proceedings, which is contrasted with decisions made under divorce proceedings.
ZZ.1999.16 · so (§ 300 Abs. 1 ZPO)
No Appeal Against Instruction Judge's Interlocutory Decision in Appellate Proceedings
Cited as the general rule for the admissibility of recourse (Rekurs) against which the court determined non-admissibility in this case.
ZZ.1993.13 · so (§ 300 ZPO)
Expert Witness Designation Appealability in Civil Proceedings
Cited in the introductory summary concerning the matter of appealability.
ZZ.1990.19 · so (Art. 300 ZPO)
Defendant v. Plaintiff (Procedural Order Appealability)
This provision is cited in the headnote indicating the non-admissibility of the appeal regarding the court president's order on document translation.
ZZ.1976.9 · so (§ 300 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Sewer Connection Provisional Order Reviewability
The appeal was dismissed to the extent that it could be considered, implying this provision governs the review of the main decision following the hearing.
C/4407/2024 · ge (art. 300 CPC)
Appellant Challenge to Denial of Provisional Estate Protective Measures
This provision is generally related to the procedure and costs allocation in the context of provisional measures, which underpins the decision on costs.
C/10310/2022 · ge (art. 299 et 300 CPC)
Allocation of Minor Child's Legal Fees in Appeal Proceedings
Cited in conjunction with Art. 95 al. 2 let. e CPC to confirm that the costs of child representation are judicial costs.
ZK1 2023 139 · gr (Art. 300 ZPO)
Provisional Child Support Recalculation Based on Changed Living Circumstances and Income Deductions
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.1.1) as the basis for precautionary measures (although Art. 303 ZPO is cited alongside it).
101 2023 276 · fr (art. 300 CPC)
Cantonal Court Upholds Children's Placement Despite Parental Conflict and Appeals
Cited to establish that the children, represented by their guardian, are formal parties to the proceedings.
ZK1 2024 12 · gr (Art. 300 ZPO)
Appeal Overturning Mandatory Psychiatric Assessment Due to Procedural Flaw in Child Representative Hearing
The court implicitly addressed the competencies of the child representative, which were violated when the lower court decided on the expert opinion without hearing the representative.
LZ220010 · zh (Art. 300 lit. c und lit. f ZPO)
Child Visitation Modification Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the responsibilities of a child representative.
BZ 2023 65 · zg (Art. 300 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appeal Against Imposition of Conciliation Costs
Although not explicitly cited in the orders, the decision to dismiss the appeal (Order 1) implies the application of the general procedural rules regarding appeal decisions, though the explicit citation is missing in the final order.
LC230018 · zh (Art. 300 ZPO)
Appeal Dismissal for Lack of Standing and Procedural Defects
This article defines the powers of the appointed child representative, relevant to the finding that the representative chose not to appeal.
ZK1 2022 116 · gr (Art. 300 ZPO)
Modification of Provisional Child Support Based on Custodial Parent's Employment
Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of the child representation's powers.
ZK 2022 498 · be (Art. 300 Bst. c ZPO)
Child Appeal of Custody Visitation Schedule Adjustment Denied
The appeal was not heard because the matter concerning personal access to the child was not qualified as a 'important question' in the meaning of this provision.