Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 30 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Bewegliche Sachen

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 2. Titel: Zuständigkeit der Gerichte und Ausstand; 2. Kapitel: Örtliche Zuständigkeit
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 30 ZPO · Bewegliche Sachen

Für Klagen, welche dingliche Rechte, den Besitz an beweglichen Sachen oder Forderungen, die durch Fahrnispfand gesichert sind, betreffen, ist das Gericht am Wohnsitz oder Sitz der beklagten Partei oder am Ort der gelegenen Sache zuständig.

Für Angelegenheiten der freiwilligen Gerichtsbarkeit ist das Gericht am Wohnsitz oder Sitz der gesuchstellenden Partei oder am Ort der gelegenen Sache zwingend zuständig.

← Art. 29 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 31 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (197)

C/11568/2017 · ge (art. 30 CPC)
Maintenance Obligation Recalculation in Divorce Proceedings
Used to determine the amount of appeal judicial fees.
101 2019 319 · fr (Art. 30 al. 1 CPC)
Child Support Modification Due to Changed Circumstances and Jurisdiction Change
Cited in the reasoning section (1.2) regarding the inadmissibility of the appeal for minor causes, relevant context for the decision.
VD.2016.93 · bs (Art. 30 ZPO)
Guardianship Extension for Asset Management Upheld Despite Appeal
The court references this article (Art. 30 VRPG, which refers to procedural law) as the general basis for imposing costs, although it ultimately waived them.
C/9871/2015 · ge (art. 30 CPC)
Parental Authority, Residence, and Child Support Following International Relocation (Spain/Andorra)
Cited in reference to determining the appeal fees.
101 2017 7 · fr (Art. 30 al. 2 CPC)
Property Owner's Summary Action for Right-of-Way Servitude Dismissed Due to Lack of Proof and Dispute; Costs Partially Reformed.
Not cited in the operative section.
KGVS C1 16 14 · vs (Art. 30 ZPO)
Employee Termination Agreement Invalid Due to Lack of Reflection Period and Unfair Concessions
Cited in the reasoning (Section 1.1) to confirm the court's jurisdiction to hear appeals where the value is between Fr. 10'000 and Fr. 30'000.
VV140006 · zh (§ 30 ZPO/ZH)
Judge Recusal Application Dismissed as Moot Following Retirement and Finding of No Objective Bias
Cited in the dispositive regarding the method of notification to one of the parties (Gesuchsgegner 3).
ZK2 2010 61 · gr (Art. 30 CPC/GR in unione con l’art. 32 CPC/GR)
Supplier v. Buyer: Debt Assumption and Contractual Liability for Photovoltaic Modules
Mentioned in the reasoning section regarding the lack of an action for joinder of a third party, not in the final orders.
135.II · vd (Art. 30 CPC)
Appeal of Default Divorce Judgment Due to Improper Service and Unresolved Support Issues
Cited in the discussion that leads to the official annulment of the judgment due to improper notification, as the appellant failed to establish the defendant's whereabouts with due diligence.
11.2010.63 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 CPC)
Judge Recusal Following Criminal Complaint by Defendant
Cited to establish that the Appellate Civil Chamber has jurisdiction over the judgment on the recusal.
11.2010.63 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 3 CPC)
Judge Recusal Following Criminal Complaint by Defendant
Cited to establish that the decision on recusal is final and cannot be appealed.
11.2010.63 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 4 CPC)
Judge Recusal Following Criminal Complaint by Defendant
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that no procedural acts needed to be annulled after the recusal request.
PN090111 · zh (§ 30 ZPO)
Improper Service of Process on Foreign Resident Overruling Default Judgment
The court noted that courts can require foreign residents to designate a domicile for service under this provision.
12.2009.152 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 CPC)
Appeal on Judicial Recusal Due to Criminal Complaints Filed Against Litigant
Cited to establish the Appellate Court's competence to rule on the recusal and subsequently to transmit jurisdiction for the abstention motions of the deputy secretaries.
12.2009.152 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 4 CPC)
Appeal on Judicial Recusal Due to Criminal Complaints Filed Against Litigant
Cited to confirm that since no procedural acts occurred after the motion submission, no acts need to be annulled.