272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 299 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Anordnung einer Vertretung des Kindes
ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 7. Titel: Kinderbelange in familienrechtlichen Angelegenheiten; 1. Kapitel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Art. 299 ZPO · Anordnung einer Vertretung des Kindes
Das Gericht ordnet wenn nötig die Vertretung des Kindes an und bezeichnet als Beiständin oder Beistand eine in fürsorgerischen und rechtlichen Fragen erfahrene Person.
Es prüft die Anordnung der Vertretung insbesondere, wenn: a. die Eltern unterschiedliche Anträge stellen bezüglich: 1. der Zuteilung der elterlichen Sorge, 2. der Zuteilung der Obhut, 3. wichtiger Fragen des persönlichen Verkehrs, 4. der Aufteilung der Betreuung, 5. des Unterhaltsbeitrages; b. die Kindesschutzbehörde oder ein Elternteil eine Vertretung beantragen; c. es aufgrund der Anhörung der Eltern oder des Kindes oder aus anderen Gründen: 1. erhebliche Zweifel an der Angemessenheit der gemeinsamen Anträge der Eltern bezüglich der Fragen nach Buchstabe a hat, oder 2. den Erlass von Kindesschutzmassnahmen erwägt.
Stellt das urteilsfähige Kind Antrag auf eine Vertretung, so ist diese anzuordnen. Das Kind kann die Nichtanordnung mit Beschwerde anfechten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (220)
VWBES.2025.87 · so (Art. 299 ZPO)
Visitation Rights Revision After Protective Measures and Dropped Criminal Investigation
Cited indirectly as context for the role of a child representative, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
ZR1 2025 102 · gr (Art. 299 N 27 ZPO)
Child Withdraws Appeal Against Custody Order; Court Divides Costs Between Parents
Cited in reasoning to justify compensating the child's representative from court funds, which is executed in Order 4.
LC240018 · zh (Art. 299 ZPO)
Divorce: Custody, Support, and Property Division Agreement Approved
Cited in the dispositive for the appointment of legal representation for the children during the appellate proceedings.
ZR1 2025 60 · gr (Art. 299 ZPO)
Stay of Custody Execution Granted Pending Appeal Due to Irreparable Harm
The suspension of enforceability explicitly excludes Order No. 3 of the contested decision, which concerns the appointment of the child's representative according to this article.
C/10310/2022 · ge (art. 299 et 300 CPC)
Allocation of Minor Child's Legal Fees in Appeal Proceedings
Cited in conjunction with Art. 95 al. 2 let. e CPC to confirm that the costs of child representation are judicial costs.
LZ240013 · zh (Art. 299 ZPO)
Custody Modification Based on Work Schedule Adjustment in Unmarried Parents' Dispute
Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's power to order representation for the child, which was rejected in the dispositive order 1.
C/13887/2022 · ge (art. 299 al. 2 CPC)
Custody Modification and Loyalty Conflict Appeal
Cited in the reasoning concerning the mandatory examination for instituting a curatorship when parental positions differ on custody or parental authority.
ZR1 2025 50 · gr (Art. 299 ZPO)
Stay of Execution for Superprovisional Custody Order Dismissed for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction
Used to deny the request for the appointment of a child representative.
C/17358/2022 · ge (art. 299 al. 1 CPC)
Custody Modification and Support Recalculation in Joint Alternating Custody Case
The relevant procedural rule concerning the court's power to order representation for the child.
PC250012 · zh (Art. 299 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Father's Appeal Regarding Child Representative Dismissed
The court used this provision to justify the court's discretion to order the representation of a child and to assess the necessity of child representation based on the circumstances of the individual case.
PC250012 · zh (Art. 299 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Father's Appeal Regarding Child Representative Dismissed
The court referenced this provision as a factor to consider when examining the necessity of child representation, specifically when parents file different requests concerning child matters.
LZ250003 · zh (Art. 299 ZPO)
Mother's Appeal Dismissed Due to Court-Appointed Child Representative's Exclusive Authority
Provides for the appointment of a legal representative for the child.
LY240037 · zh (Art. 299 Abs. 2 lit. a Ziff. 2 und Ziff. 4 ZPO)
Custody Modification Appeal Settlement
Although cited in the Klägerin's appeal requests (which were not granted), this provision relates to a procedural request (appointment of a children's representative) that was implicitly superseded by order 2, but as it was cited in the context of the overall ruling structure (implied in the withdrawal of further requests), it must be checked against the final orders. Since order 2 states that all further/different requests are withdrawn, and no substantive provision was used for the decision itself (which approved a settlement), this procedural code concerning representation is excluded as it was not explicitly used in the final binding orders (1-5).
LC240024 · zh (Art. 299 ZPO)
Child Custody Intervention Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Legal Interest
Cited multiple times in the reasoning concerning the appointment of legal representation for the child (Kindesvertretung).
LC240044 · zh (Art. 299 Abs. ZPO)
Custody and Child Support Appeal Affirming Restricted Father Visitation
Cited in the dispositive order (Beschluss 3) as the basis for rejecting the appellant's request for the appointment of a child representative in the appeal proceedings.