272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 285 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Eingabe bei umfassender Einigung

ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 6. Titel: Besondere eherechtliche Verfahren; 2. Kapitel: Scheidungsverfahren

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 285 ZPO · Eingabe bei umfassender Einigung

Die gemeinsame Eingabe der Ehegatten enthält: a. die Namen und Adressen der Ehegatten sowie die Bezeichnung allfälliger Vertreterinnen und Vertreter; b. das gemeinsame Scheidungsbegehren; c. die vollständige Vereinbarung über die Scheidungsfolgen; d. die gemeinsamen Anträge hinsichtlich der Kinder; e. die erforderlichen Belege; f. das Datum und die Unterschriften.

← Art. 284 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 286 ZPO →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (371)

ZVE.2024.20 · ag (Art. 285 lit. d ZPO)

Restraining Orders, Child Custody, and Proper Jurisdiction

Cited in relation to the court's consideration of parental agreements in child matters.

HC.2021.326 · vd (Art. 285 CPC)

Divorce Petition Admissibility and Substantive Rectification

Cited in the reasoning section when discussing the formal requirements for a joint divorce petition with full agreement.

HC.2021.234 · vd (Art. 285 let. b CPC)

Appeal Regarding Child Support Upon Relocation and Modification of Custody/Property Administration

Cited in relation to the fact that the agreement on the children's fate does not bind the court.

C/5353/2020 · ge (art. 285 let. d CPC)

Appeal on Provisional Measures Regarding Parental Rights and Visitation for Incarcerated Father

Cited to establish that spouses' agreement on children's fate is not binding but has the nature of a common conclusion, justifying the review of the initial agreement.

PC170035 · zh (Art. 285 ZPO)

Divorce Petition Lacks Grounds for Free Legal Aid

Cited in discussions regarding double representation by a lawyer.

FE.2017.6 · sg (Art. 285 ZPO)

Unilateral Revocation of Joint Divorce Petition Requires Personal Declaration

Cited in the reasoning concerning the personal signing of the divorce agreement, which is related to the requirement for a personal withdrawal.

12.2013.22 · ti (art. 285 cpv. 2 lett. e CPC/TI)

Insurer Liability and Apportionment of Damages Following Sequential Accidents

The decision on the basis for the applicant's income calculation was annulled due to lack of motivation, as cited in the reasoning leading to the remand.

Pron.2012.119 · vd (Art. 285 CPC)

Dismissal of Divorce Petition for Failure to Meet Formal Requirements

Cited as the legal standard that the joint request for divorce failed to meet.

AA100145 · zh (§ 285 ZPO ZH)

Minority Shareholder Information Right Dispute Upheld on Appeal

Cited because substantive federal law questions are excluded from review in the cantonal cassation procedure under this provision.

AA100132 · zh (§ 285 ZPO/ZH)

Share Purchase Price Installment Enforcement Appeal

Used to confirm that certain substantive claims regarding contract qualification and interpretation are reserved for the Federal Supreme Court.

AA100101 · zh (§ 285 ZPO/ZH)

Contractor's Failure to Prove Assumption of Geotechnical Risk Under Fixed-Price Contract

This procedural rule was cited in relation to the inadmissibility of claims concerning the violation of federal law in the cantonal cassation procedure.

AA100146 · zh (§ 285 ZPO ZH)

Appeal Against Reimbursement Order for Adult Daughter's Social Assistance

Cited as the procedural rule preventing the Court of Cassation from reviewing complaints about the alleged incorrect application of federal law in assessing the appellant's financial capacity.

AA100099 · zh (§ 285 ZPO/ZH)

Appeal Regarding Liability Under Lease Agreement

This provision, concerning the subsidiarity of the cantonal nullity appeal against decisions appealable to the Federal Supreme Court, was cited in the final order to limit the scope of review.

AA100091 · zh (§ 285 ZPO ZH)

Appeal Against Grant of Summary Execution Based on Foreign Judgment Under Lugano Convention

Cited in the reasoning section (IV.2.6 b, IV.8.2) regarding the inadmissibility of Rügen related to federal law (LugÜ) in the cantonal cassation appeal, but not in the dispositive.

Pron.2011.92 · vd (Art. 285 CPC)

Divorce by Mutual Consent Procedural Non-Compliance and Inadmissible Appeal

This article concerning the required content of a joint divorce application was cited, although the appeal based on this matter was rejected due to lack of reasoning.