Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 275 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Aufhebung des gemeinsamen Haushalts

ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 6. Titel: Besondere eherechtliche Verfahren; 2. Kapitel: Scheidungsverfahren
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 275 ZPO · Aufhebung des gemeinsamen Haushalts

Jeder Ehegatte kann nach Eintritt der Rechtshängigkeit für die Dauer des Scheidungsverfahrens den gemeinsamen Haushalt aufheben.

← Art. 274 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 276 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (23)

AbR.2004.05.Nr.12 · ow (Art. 275 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Construction Lien Provisional Registration: Contractor Bears Costs and Attorney Fees
Cited in the dispositive, in conjunction with Art. 93 ZPO, as the basis for ordering the respondent to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings and pay the appellants' legal costs after the appeal was granted.
ZZ.1991.26 · so (§ 275 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Judicial Parking Prohibition Enforcement Lacks Required Public Notice
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for the applicant to merely make their right to possessory protection credible.
ZZ.1988.11 · so (§ 275 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Municipality Possessory Protection for Formerly Public Land Used for Parking
The court cites this article as the general provision allowing the landowner (and by extension, the municipality) to request a general prohibition against unauthorized interference with property use.
ZZ.1988.11 · so (§ 275 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Municipality Possessory Protection for Formerly Public Land Used for Parking
This paragraph is cited regarding the conditions under which the prohibition must be granted, including the threatened penalty.
SB.2022.00113 · zh (Art. 275 ZPO)
Taxation of Separated Spouses - Undivided Marriage Status
Relevant for procedural aspects concerning separation of spouses, influencing taxation.
DB.2022.53 · zh (Art. 275 ZPO)
Joint Taxation for Married Couple with Spouse Abroad
Mentioned in relation to the conditions for separation of household in divorce proceedings, used to contrast with situations not meeting this threshold for separate taxation.
PF170009 · zh (Art. 275 ZPO)
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Parking Injunction Dismissed
The court confirmed the lower court's finding that the prerequisites for the summary procedure (Rechtsschutz in klaren Fällen) under this article were met.
AbR.1982.83.Nr.18 · ow (Art. 275 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Tenant's Withdrawal Voids Lease Extension Judgment
Cited in conjunction with Art. 93 Abs. 1 ZPO to explain the general rule for imposing court costs on the losing party, including a party who withdraws their claim.
AbR.2002.03.Nr.11 · ow (Art. 275 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Expert Witness Qualification in Whiplash Case
Cited in the alternative request to appoint a different expert.
AbR.2004.05.Nr.19 · ow (Art. 275 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Enforcement of Foreign Judgment: Appeal Stage Hearing Rights
Cited as the procedural basis for remanding the case to the lower court for a new decision.
AbR.2004.05.Nr.5 · ow (Art. 275 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Employee Entitled to Wages Through Notice Period After Business Transfer
Cited in relation to the impossibility of awarding party compensation to the appellant due to their loss.
HC.2015.750 · vd (Art. 275 al. 1 CPC)
Child Custody Appeal Upheld Despite Parental Disparity
Cited in the ruling preamble regarding the regulation of provisional measures.
Arr.t.2012.463 · vd (art. 275 CPC)
Compensation Fund Supplemental Benefits Effective Date Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to support the finding that the opening of divorce proceedings allows for separation from that point.
EZ110064 · zh (§ 275 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Freezing Injunction Enforcement Under Lugano Convention
Cited in the initial requests (though the request was denied in order 2) concerning the withdrawal of the suspensive effect of an appeal.
11 08 145 · lu (§ 275 lit. a ZPO)
Revision Refused Due to Change in Legal Basis of Claim
The court did not enter a ruling on the revision request because the alleged new facts constitute an inadmissible change of claim, which implicitly relates to the grounds for admitting a revision.