272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 273 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Verfahren
ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 6. Titel: Besondere eherechtliche Verfahren; 1. Kapitel: Angelegenheiten des summarischen Verfahrens
Art. 273 ZPO · Verfahren
Das Gericht führt eine mündliche Verhandlung durch. Es kann nur darauf verzichten, wenn der Sachverhalt aufgrund der Eingaben der Parteien klar oder unbestritten ist.
Die Parteien müssen persönlich erscheinen, sofern das Gericht sie nicht wegen Krankheit, Alter oder anderen wichtigen Gründen dispensiert.
Das Gericht versucht, zwischen den Parteien eine Einigung herbeizuführen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (83)
400.24.265 · bl (Art. 273 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Father's Appeal for Shared Custody Denied Due to Lack of Cooperation
Cited in relation to the obligation for parties to appear in Eheschutz proceedings.
101 2024 167 · fr (art. 273 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal Against Provisional Spousal Maintenance Increase Due to Violation of Right to be Heard
Cited in the reasoning as the provision requiring a hearing in matrimonial provisional measures, the violation of which justified the annulment.
C/22470/2022 · ge (art. 273 CPC)
Modification of Provisional Measures in Child Custody and Visitation Following Domestic Violence Allegations
The court justified the initial decision to hold an oral procedure based on this provision, rejecting the claim of violation of the right to be heard.
LE230009 · zh (Art. 273 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Custody and Support Appeal: Child Relocation Upheld, Support Recalculated
Cited in relation to the obligation of the court to hold an oral hearing, and the conditions under which it can be waived.
ZSU.2023.225 · ag (Art. 273 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appellate Court Reverses Denial of Hearing on Unclear Financial Facts
The court considered that the conditions for waiving a hearing were not met as the factual situation was neither clear nor undisputed.
13.2023.60 · ti (art. 273 e 276 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Refusal to Continue Preliminary Relief in Divorce Proceeding
Mentioned in the reasoning to support the need for final hearing arguments in the procedural stage that was improperly closed, although not explicitly cited in the final orders, they relate to the procedure that must be resumed.
BZ 2023 58 · zg (Art. 273 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Attorney Fee Reduction Appeal in Spousal Support Case
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conduct of the oral hearing in summary proceedings for matrimonial protection measures.
BZ 2023 58 · zg (Art. 273 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Attorney Fee Reduction Appeal in Spousal Support Case
Cited in the reasoning regarding the oral hearing in summary proceedings for matrimonial protection.
BZ 2023 58 · zg (Art. 273 ZPO)
Attorney Fee Reduction Appeal in Spousal Support Case
Cited in the reasoning regarding the objective of the oral hearing in matrimonial protection proceedings.
LY230029 · zh (Art. 273 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Mother v. Father: Appeal Regarding Moot Summer Holiday Custody Order
Cited in connection with Art. 276 ZPO regarding the conditions under which a hearing for precautionary measures can be waived.
ZSU.2022.270 · ag (Art. 273 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Spousal Support Suspension Reversed for Lack of Oral Hearing
Cited as the legal basis for when a court can dispense with an oral hearing, which the lower court incorrectly applied.
16.2022.25 · ti (art. 273 cpv. 1 CPC)
Husband's Appeal Against Ad Litem Allowance Granted Due to Procedural Errors
Cited by implication in the reasoning leading to the annulment, as the appeal complained about a violation of this procedural rule regarding the hearing in summary proceedings.
101 2021 459 · fr (Art. 273 al. 1 CPC)
Spousal Support Modification Appeal
Cited regarding reinforced duty to investigate under the social inquisitorial maxim, but not applied in the operative part.
FS.2020.32.und.35.EZ · sg (Art. 273 ZPO)
Appeal on Spousal Support: Procedural Fairness and Imputed Earning Capacity
Cited to establish the mandatory nature of an oral hearing in spousal protection proceedings.
11.2021.35 · ti (art. 273 cpv. 2 CPC)
Husband's Absence in Marital Protection Proceedings Due to Health Concerns and Denial of Written Statement
The court implicitly relied on the context of the mandatory personal appearance requirement when discussing the rules for absence and the potential for videoconference substitution.