Art. 255 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Untersuchungsgrundsatz

60/2008/36 · sh (Art. 255 ZPO)

Deficient Justification in Public Procurement Costs Award

Applied to order the costs of the appeal proceedings to be imposed on the awarding authority based on the polluter pays principle.

ZKREK.2008.351 · so (§ 255 lit. d ZPO)

Supply Contract Termination and Injunctive Relief for Specific Performance

This provision defines the content of interim orders, which the court used to confirm the permissibility of performance measures (orders to do something).

ZKREK.2003.56 · so (§ 255 lit. d ZPO)

Association Merger Declaratory Judgment Injunction Overturned

The court ruled that a declaratory claim cannot be the subject of an interlocutory injunction based on this provision.

ZZ.1998.10 · so (§ 255 lit. a ZPO)

Rejection of Urgent Injunction to Prevent Bank Guarantee Withdrawal Due to Unclear Facts and Claim for Monetary Security

The court found that the requirements for issuing an interim injunction under this provision were not met because the facts were disputed.

ZZ.1998.10 · so (§ 255 lit. d ZPO)

Rejection of Urgent Injunction to Prevent Bank Guarantee Withdrawal Due to Unclear Facts and Claim for Monetary Security

The court found that this provision was not applicable because the claim concerned securing a monetary performance.

ZZ.1992.13 · so (§ 255 lit. b ZPO)

Preliminary Injunction Prerequisites under $\S 255$ lit. b vs. $\S 255$ lit. d

The court's reasoning is focused on interpreting and applying this specific provision regarding interim measures to secure the subject of the dispute.

ZZ.1992.13 · so (§ 255 lit. d ZPO)

Preliminary Injunction Prerequisites under $\S 255$ lit. b vs. $\S 255$ lit. d

The court analyzes the cumulative requirements for obtaining a precautionary measure under this specific provision regarding securing a claim for performance.

ZZ.1987.3 · so (§ 255 lit. b ZPO)

Shareholder Registration Dispute and Preliminary Injunction Denial

This provision was cited as a basis for the applicants' request for protective measures in the main proceedings, although the court ultimately found the requirements not met for granting the preliminary injunction.

ZZ.1987.3 · so (§ 255 lit. d ZPO)

Shareholder Registration Dispute and Preliminary Injunction Denial

This provision was cited as the applicable standard for preliminary injunctions concerning potential significant changes to the subject matter or imminent, irreparable harm, and the court analyzed the requirements under this specific section.

ZZ.1985.4 · so (§ 255 lit. b ZPO)

Injunction Against Shareholder Resolution Registration as Security Measure

This provision was considered, but ultimately deemed inapplicable for the specific type of protection sought in this case.

ZZ.1985.4 · so (§ 255 lit. d ZPO)

Injunction Against Shareholder Resolution Registration as Security Measure

This provision's requirements must be met because the requested measure secures the execution of a potential future judgment.

ZZ.1985.3 · so (§ 255 lit. d ZPO)

Goldfischli v. Mandelfischli Trademark Dispute

This procedural rule was cited as universally applicable to specify the requirements for granting provisional measures under UWG and MSchG.

ZZ.1984.8 · so (§ 255 lit. c ZPO)

Possessory Injunction Barred by Prior Judgment and Lack of Actual Possession

Cited as the basis under which the initial protective order request was made.

ZZ.1984.4 · so (§ 255 lit. a ZPO)

Consultant v. Purchasing Cooperative: Post-Termination Commission Accounting

The court deemed the conditions for applying the simplified procedure (Befehlsverfahren) under this provision to be met.

ZZ.1982.5 · so (§ 255 lit. a ZPO)

Application for Interim Injunction Based Solely on Undisputed Facts vs. Alternative Relief Provisions

The court ruled based on the inadmissibility of the request under this provision as it was the explicit legal basis chosen by the applicant.