272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 237 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Zwischenentscheid
ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 3. Titel: Ordentliches Verfahren; 5. Kapitel: Entscheid
Art. 237 ZPO · Zwischenentscheid
Das Gericht kann einen Zwischenentscheid treffen, wenn durch abweichende oberinstanzliche Beurteilung sofort ein Endentscheid herbeigeführt und so ein bedeutender Zeit- oder Kostenaufwand gespart werden kann.
Der Zwischenentscheid ist selbstständig anzufechten; eine spätere Anfechtung zusammen mit dem Endentscheid ist ausgeschlossen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (295)
ZK 2015 500 · be (Art. 237 ZPO)
Liability Quota Appealability in Partial Judgment
The appeal was dismissed because the prerequisite for an appealable interlocutory decision (Zwischenentscheid) under this article was not met.
RBOG.2013.Nr.11 · tg (Art. 237 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appeal on Value of Dispute Rejected
Cited in relation to the criteria for issuing an interlocutory decision that would lead to a final decision immediately.
11 02 80 · lu (§ 237 lit. c ZPO)
Co-owners' Appeal for Vehicle Access Prohibition on Private Property
Applied to decide that the applicants must bear the costs of the first instance proceedings.
RBOG.1994.Nr.31 · tg (§ 237 ZPO)
Carnival Newspaper Sale and Effect of Appeal on Superprovisional Order
Cited in the heading and implicitly governing the effect of the appeal on the preliminary injunctions, although the specific application relates to the suspended effect.
ZZ.1990.5 · so (§ 237 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Tax Authority vs. Property Owner: Definitive Entry of Statutory Mortgage for Real Estate Gains Tax
Cited in conjunction with § 285 Abs. 4 EG ZGB to establish jurisdiction for the judge in the summary procedure.
ZZ.1990.5 · so (§ 237 Abs. 2 lit. p ZPO i.V.m. § 285 Abs. 4 EG ZGB)
Tax Authority vs. Property Owner: Definitive Entry of Statutory Mortgage for Real Estate Gains Tax
Used to determine that the ruling on the lien entry application must be made under the simplified procedure (Summarentscheid) as the sole decision by the civil court.
C1 23 208 · vs (art. 237 al. 1 CPC)
Prescription of Claim to Divide Unadjudicated Occupational Benefits Following Foreign Divorce Decree
Used to define the contested decision as interlocutory, which justifies the immediate admissibility of the appeal under Art. 308 CPC.
C1 23 208 · vs (art. 237 al. 2 CPC)
Prescription of Claim to Divide Unadjudicated Occupational Benefits Following Foreign Divorce Decree
Cited to confirm that an interlocutory decision rejecting the plea of prescription is immediately challengeable by appeal (or a strict appeal).
C/24388/2019 · ge (Art. 237 CPC)
Appellant v. Volunteer Security Worker Regarding Altercation and Injury
Cited in the legal reasoning regarding procedural limitation.
LE230056 · zh (Art. 237 ZPO)
Parental Separation, Custody, and Relocation of Children (Switzerland to Uruguay)
Cited in reasoning regarding the nature of the lower court's decision regarding the continuation of proceedings despite withdrawal.
11.2022.127 · ti (art. 237 CPC)
Water Runoff Remediation Claim Not Barred by Res Judicata Due to Substantively Different Relief Sought
Mentioned in consideration 1 to classify the nature of the lower court's decision regarding the procedural prerequisite.
101 2024 162 · fr (art. 237 CPC)
Appeal on Procedural Flaws in Unilateral Divorce Petition Ruling
Cited in the reasoning to classify the original decision as an interlocutory decision subject to immediate appeal, although the main ground for appeal admission was based on later articles.
C/24994/2020 · ge (Art. 237 al. 1 CPC)
Estate Recovery Action Based on Later Discovered Will
Cited to define what constitutes an interlocutory decision, relevant for determining appeal admissibility.
C/11381/2021 · ge (art. 237 CPC)
State of Geneva DDP Option Assignment Validity Appeal
Cited in the reasoning section to establish that the contested decision was an interlocutory decision subject to immediate appeal.
ZVE.2023.8 · ag (Art. 237 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Employee v. Employer: Machine Safety and Contributory Negligence
Applied to justify the admissibility of an interim decision in an appealable case to save time and costs.