272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 226 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Instruktionsverhandlung
ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 3. Titel: Ordentliches Verfahren; 2. Kapitel: Schriftenwechsel und Vorbereitung der Hauptverhandlung
Art. 226 ZPO · Instruktionsverhandlung
Das Gericht kann jederzeit Instruktionsverhandlungen durchführen.
Die Instruktionsverhandlung dient der freien Erörterung des Streitgegenstandes, der Ergänzung des Sachverhaltes, dem Versuch einer Einigung und der Vorbereitung der Hauptverhandlung.
Das Gericht kann Beweise abnehmen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (111)
C3 06 20 · vs (Art. 226 Abs. 2 lit. b ZPO)
Trade Secret Protection Overrides Document Production in Evidence Admission Appeal
This provision establishes the condition that an appeal in nullity against a decision admitting a disputed piece of evidence can only be lodged if it causes an irremediable disadvantage, which was found to be met in this case.
C3 05 106 · vs (Art. 226 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Appealability of Evidential Rulings on Expert Witness Evidence
This article is cited in the introductory summary defining the scope of appealability, though the primary ground for the final order is Art. 146 Abs. 3 ZPO.
C/14084/2021 · ge (art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Prescription Period Start Date and Burden of Proof in Payment Claim
Cited when discussing the timing for alleging facts in the procedure.
ZSU.2024.195 · ag (Art. 226 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Delay in Proceedings Dismissed Due to Subsequent Procedural Advancements
Cited in the reasoning to explain that the court's approach to scheduling the main hearing is in line with this provision.
101 2023 395 · fr (art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Spousal Support Modification Appeal: Cohabitation, Income Reduction, and Housing Expense Recalculation
Cited in the reasoning concerning the deadline for making allegations in the reply/duplication if no second exchange of submissions is ordered.
C/7099/2020 · ge (art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Subcontractor Payment Dispute and Procedural Admissibility
Cited regarding the possibility of alleging facts in the reply or rejoinder if a second exchange is ordered, or orally during instruction hearings.
CACIV.2024.2 · ne (Art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Artisan's Lien Registration Refusal Due to Insufficient Work Detail
Cited in the reasoning regarding when facts can be alleged in the reply or rejoinder.
C/12634/2020 · ge (art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Director's Termination Upheld Due to Suspected Concerted Client Solicitation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rights of parties during the instructional hearing, which informed the decision on admissibility of allegations (point 3).
A/3601/2022 · ge (art. 226 CPC)
Insurance Disability Benefits Settlement Ratification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's power to order instruction hearings and the possibility for parties to reach an agreement.
C/4897/2019 · ge (art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Insurance Rescission for Non-Disclosure of Claims History
Cited regarding the timing for alleging facts in the reply/duplication or during instruction hearings.
C/3583/2021 · ge (art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Borrower v. Lender: Negative Libor and Default Interest on Loan Agreement
Cited regarding the timing for alleging facts in the reply/duplic if a second exchange of written submissions is ordered.
C/6251/2020 · ge (Art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Labor Dispute: Variable Compensation, Vacation Indemnity, and Wrongful Dismissal Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure for introducing new arguments/evidence.
C/22504/2019 · ge (art. 226 CPC)
Insurer Appeal Regarding Proof of Burglary Loss and Expert Assessment Refusal
Cited in the reasoning concerning the inadmissibility of new facts at the oral hearing stage.
CACIV.2023.29 · ne (Art. 226 al. 2 CPC)
Employee Injury Claim Rejection Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Employer Negligence
Cited regarding when facts can be alleged in the reply and rejoinder or during the oral proceedings.
C/15944/2016 · ge (art. 226 CPC)
Fraud Liability and Indemnity Offset in Damages Calculation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of new facts and evidence in the first instance.