Art. 216 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Verhältnis zum gerichtlichen Verfahren

ZZ.1991.16 · so (§ 216 ZPO)

Challenge to Dismissal Based on Unproven Judicial Settlement

Cited in the reasoning to establish the requirements for a judicial settlement, which was the central issue leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision.

RX230005 · zh (Art. 216 ZPO)

Consolidation of Protective Letter Proceeding with Appeal Case

The court ordered the merging of the protection of writing procedure with the appeal procedure and its subsequent archival, implicitly referring to procedural rules governing such administrative actions, although the specific article cited in the dispositive for this action is often related to the ZPO provisions governing the management of related cases.

40/2008/19 · sh (Art. 216 ZPO)

Property Owners v. Neighbors Regarding Setback Violations and Tree Trimming

Cited in conjunction with Art. 295 ZPO to justify the court conducting the on-the-spot inspection ex officio.

19.2019 · vd (art. 216 CPC)

Attorney Discipline for Disclosure of Mediation Confidentiality

The violation of this article concerning the confidentiality of mediation was established as the basis for the breach of professional rules.

C/21929/2017 · ge (art. 216 al. 2 CPC)

Mother Granted Exclusive Custody Due to Parental Conflict and Logistical Burdens

Cited in the reasoning to exclude statements made during mediation from being considered in the judicial procedure.

HC.2010.668 · vd (art. 216 CPC)

Employment Termination Appeal Regarding Fraudulent Convictions and Breach of Trust

The court mentions the inapplicability of this article concerning false testimony, as the appellant failed to request its application during the initial hearing.

100.2009.992 · bl (§ 216 Abs. 3 ZPO)

Appellant's Failure to Appear Triggers Appeal Period

The court cited this provision to establish when a legal relationship between parties arises in a lawsuit, which is a prerequisite for the presumption of notice of a judgment.

copy.of.2010.37 · bl (§ 216 Abs. 3 ZPO)

Appeal Period Starts with Oral Pronouncement, Even if Absent

Cited as the basis for the legal relationship between parties in a proceeding, which is a prerequisite for the fiction of notice of judgment.

100.2008.1153 · bl (§ 216 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Appeal Invalid Due to Late Payment of Appeal Cost Deposit

Cited regarding the timely payment of the appeal cost deposit as an indispensable condition for the validity of an appeal and the requirement that payment must be executed within the deadline, not just initiated.

copy.of.2009.51 · bl (§ 216 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Appeal Filing and Payment Deadline

The timely payment of the advance on costs is an indispensable requirement for the validity of an appeal.

100.07.1040 · bl (§ 216 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Timeliness of Electronic Appeal Cost Deposits

This provision is cited as the basis for the court's determination of what constitutes timely payment of the appeal cost deposit, particularly concerning electronic payment methods and the setting of due dates.

copy.of.2008.19 · bl (§ 216 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Appellant's Responsibility for Timely Payment Credit

This provision is cited in relation to the conditions for timely payment of appeal costs and the consequences of late payment, which directly impacts the validity of the appeal.

11 02 70 · lu (§§ 216 und 249 ZPO)

Appeal Court Refuses Inadmissible Post-Pleading Submissions Due to Procedural Bars

These provisions are cited in relation to the inadmissibility of further submissions and the scope of the investigation principle in appellate proceedings.

PZ 2002 94 · gr (Art. 216 ZPO)

Contractor Appeal Regarding Scope of Evidentiary Examination of Building Defects

Cited by the lower court to assign the costs of the proceedings to the applicant (although Art. 216 ZPO appears in the lower court's order, it is listed here as the basis for the cost decision in the final order of the appeal court).

PZ 2002 94 · gr (Art. 216 ZPO)

Contractor Appeal Regarding Scope of Evidentiary Examination of Building Defects

Cited by the lower court to determine that the costs of the expert opinion and administrative proceedings are borne by the applicant.