272
ZPOCPC
CH
Art. 211 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Wirkungen
ZPO; 2. Teil: Besondere Bestimmungen; 1. Titel: Schlichtungsversuch; 4. Kapitel: Entscheidvorschlag und Entscheid
Art. 211 ZPO · Wirkungen
Der Entscheidvorschlag gilt als angenommen und hat die Wirkungen eines rechtskräftigen Entscheids, wenn ihn keine Partei innert 20 Tagen seit der schriftlichen Eröffnung ablehnt. Die Ablehnung bedarf keiner Begründung.
Nach Eingang der Ablehnung stellt die Schlichtungsbehörde die Klagebewilligung zu: a. in den Angelegenheiten nach Artikel 210 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b: der ablehnenden Partei; b. in den übrigen Fällen: der klagenden Partei.
Wird die Klage in den Angelegenheiten nach Artikel 210 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b nicht rechtzeitig eingereicht, so gilt der Entscheidvorschlag als anerkannt und er hat die Wirkungen eines rechtskräftigen Entscheides.
Die Parteien sind im Entscheidvorschlag auf die Wirkungen nach den Absätzen 1–3 hinzuweisen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (71)
ZVE.2024.7 · ag (Art. 211 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO)
Tenant's Rental Dispute: Landlord's Failed Attempt to Annul Conciliation Decision
States that a settlement proposal is considered accepted and has the effect of a final decision if not rejected within 20 days.
ZVE.2024.7 · ag (Art. 211 Abs. 2 lit. a ZPO)
Tenant's Rental Dispute: Landlord's Failed Attempt to Annul Conciliation Decision
States that the conciliation authority issues the authorization to sue to the rejecting party.
ZVE.2024.7 · ag (Art. 211 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Tenant's Rental Dispute: Landlord's Failed Attempt to Annul Conciliation Decision
States that if the lawsuit is not filed in time, the settlement proposal is considered recognized and has the effect of a final decision.
PD240001 · zh (Art. 211 Abs. 2 lit. a ZPO)
Sublessor Eviction Security Deposit Appeal Procedural Ruling
Cited to explain why the claimant/defendant roles switched after the settlement proposal was rejected, leading to the claimant having to initiate the court action.
PD240001 · zh (Art. 211 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Sublessor Eviction Security Deposit Appeal Procedural Ruling
Cited to explain the legal consequence (deemed acceptance of the proposal) if the claimant had not filed a suit.
ZVE.2022.52 · ag (Art. 211 Abs. 2 lit. b ZPO)
Defendant Liable for Outstanding Washing Machine Repair Debt
Cited in the reasoning regarding the issuance of a writ of summons for legal proceedings after conciliatory proceedings.
RU230012 · zh (Art. 211 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Defendant's Untimely Rejection of Conciliation Settlement Renders Appeal Inadmissible
Cited in the reasoning regarding the inappealability of the judgment proposal if it is not rejected in time.
13.2022.28 · ti (art. 211 cpv. 2 lettera b CPC)
Appeal Regarding Deadline Reinstatement After Conciliation Hearing Appearance Disparity
This provision dictates what happens when the proposal for judgment is not accepted (authorizing the plaintiff to sue), which the court references when partially accepting the appeal in order 1.
MJ210013.L.U · zh (Art. 211 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Claimant Barred by Finality of Prior Dismissal from Re-litigating Owner-Occupancy Termination Validity in Damages Suit
This provision is cited as the basis for the ruling that the settlement authority's proposal became legally binding due to the failure to pay the advance for court costs, despite timely rejection and initiation of the claim.
RU210076 · zh (Art. 211 Abs. 2 lit. a ZPO)
Legal Aid Granted for Residential Lease Conciliation Due to Complex Issues and Vulnerable Party
Cited to explain the procedure and potential outcomes of a conciliation hearing, which influenced the assessment of the case's complexity and the need for legal aid.
RU210076 · zh (Art. 211 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Legal Aid Granted for Residential Lease Conciliation Due to Complex Issues and Vulnerable Party
Cited to explain the potential legal effects of a conciliation hearing, which influenced the assessment of the case's complexity and the need for legal aid.
ZK2 2020 52 · sz (Art. 211 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Tenants v. Landlord Regarding Timeliness of Settlement Rejection and Authorization to Sue
The court relied on the correct interpretation of this article (regarding the 20-day period for rejecting a settlement proposal) in conjunction with Art. 145 Abs. 2 lit. a ZPO to rule that the rejection was timely.
ZK2 2020 52 · sz (Art. 211 ZPO)
Tenants v. Landlord Regarding Timeliness of Settlement Rejection and Authorization to Sue
The court explicitly analyzed this article concerning the effect of settlement proposals and rejection deadlines, determining they are subject to the suspension of deadlines.
A/2415/2020 · ge (art. 211 CPC)
Bankruptcy Notice Validity Despite Pending Federal Appeal
This article confirms that the decision granting final lifting of opposition entered into force because no opposition was filed against the judge's proposal.
RU200013 · zh (Art. 211 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Enforcement Certificate Challenge and Reinstatement of Deadline
Cited in the reasoning to explain why the settlement proposal gained legal force, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.