272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 182 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Protokoll
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Beweis; 3. Kapitel: Beweismittel
Art. 182 ZPO · Protokoll
Über den Augenschein ist Protokoll zu führen. Es wird gegebenenfalls mit Plänen, Zeichnungen, fotografischen und andern technischen Mitteln ergänzt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (31)
10/2002/13 · sh (Art. 182 Abs. 2 Ziff. 3 ZPO)
Paternity Presumption Waiver and Cost Deposit Requirement
This procedural rule was cited by the lower court in imposing the security deposit for the taking of evidence.
HC.2022.362 · vd (Art. 182 CPC)
Landlord Appeal Regarding Tenant Access and Signage Obstructions
This article was cited in the reasoning section discussing the requirements for the record of the inspection.
10/1998/28 · sh (Art. 182 ZPO)
Lease Dispute: Evidentiary Hearing Dispensed with Due to Sufficient Documented Evidence
Cited in the reasoning to justify proceeding directly to the taking of evidence when parties have already designated their evidence and it was deemed sufficient.
16.2012.34 · ti (art. 182 CPC)
Contractor Appeal Upheld Due to Procedural Violations in Evidence Gathering
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement that the inspection be minuted, which was omitted.
KK.2006.00037 · zh (§ 182 ZPO)
Insurer Wins Overpayment Repayment in Disability Benefits Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the possibility of calling the expert to the hearing.
11.2008.82 · ti (art. 182 cpv. 1 CPC)
Appeal of Visitation and Support Orders Deemed Moot and Inadmissible
Cited as the legal basis under which the judge issues the order concerning admitted evidence, which was subsequently deemed unappealable.
SB 2006 10 · gr (Art. 182 ZPO)
False Testimony Conviction Overturned Due to Procedural Error in Witness Statement Recording
The court based its decision to acquit on the violation of the procedural formality requirement for witness testimony contained in this article.
SB 2006 10 · gr (Art. 182 ZPO)
Appellant v. State: Invalid Testimony Foundation for False Testimony Conviction
This procedural rule concerning the recording and validation of witness testimony was determined to be a rule of validity, leading to the acquittal on the substantive charge when violated.
11.2005.131 · ti (art. 182 cpv. 1 CPC)
Access Ramp Easement Dispute and Appealability of Evidentiary Rulings
This article was cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal concerning the evidence ruling, although the appeal was ultimately dismissed on other grounds.
60.2004.232 · ti (art. 182 CPC)
Criminal File Access for Civil Proceedings
This article was mentioned as the basis for the lower court's ordinance allowing the request, although the final decision rests on art. 27 CPP.
CCC.2002.119 · ne (Art. 182 CPC)
Heirs' Estate Division Agreement Lacked Finality for Judicial Enforcement
Cited in the reasoning to establish that a judicial transaction has the effects of a final judgment, which informed the outcome regarding the executability of the agreement.
11.2002.66 · ti (art. 182 cpv. 3 in relazione con l'art. 95 cpv. 1 CPC)
Appealability of Evidentiary Orders in Divorce Actions
These provisions are cited in the reasoning to support the finding that the appeal against the refusal to modify the evidence order (order 1) is inadmissible.
CCC.2003.9 · ne (art.182 CPC)
Landlord v. Tenant: Enforceability of Judicial Settlement Regarding Agricultural Lease Eviction
The court applied this article because the settlement agreement reached by the parties has the effect of a final judgment, justifying the request for forced execution.
CCC.2002.63 · ne (art.182 CPC)
Spousal Support Modification Appeal Regarding Employment Income and Cohabitation Assumptions
Cited to establish the binding authority of the judicial transaction of November 16, 1999.
11.2000.149 · ti (art. 182 cpv. 1 CPC)
Husband Appeals Denial of Post-Divorce Maintenance and Provisional Support Termination in Divorce Action
Cited regarding the judge's authority to set the order and date for taking evidence via ordinance, which is unappealable.