Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 174 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Konfrontation

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Beweis; 3. Kapitel: Beweismittel
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 174 ZPO · Konfrontation

Zeuginnen und Zeugen können einander und den Parteien gegenübergestellt werden.

← Art. 173 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 175 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)

249----------- · vd (Art. 174 al. 2 ch. 1 CPC)
Appeal of Default Bankruptcy Order Dismissed Due to Untimely Filing
This provision defines the conditions under which the appellate authority can annul the bankruptcy opening (payment of debt), although the court ultimately rejected the appeal on procedural grounds.
PS220100 · zh (Art. 174 ZPO)
Annulment of Bankruptcy Due to Improper Summons and Prior Debt Satisfaction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadline for filing the appeal.
PS220100 · zh (Art. 174 ZPO)
Annulment of Bankruptcy Due to Improper Summons and Prior Debt Satisfaction
Cited in the reasoning to establish the deadline for filing the appeal (though not explicitly in the final orders, it governs the procedure).
C/7303/2022 · ge (Art. 174 CPC)
Appeal of Bankruptcy Judgment and Subsequent Withdrawal of Creditors' Request
Cited in the reasoning section, this article likely relates to the general procedure or conditions applicable to the decision made.
PS130147 · zh (Art. 174 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Appeal Granted: Bankruptcy Order Overturned Due to Post-Order, Pre-Appeal Payment
This article reference is not present in the text; the citation is Art. 174 Abs. 2 SchKG.
RVJ 2013 p 240 248 · vs (Art. 174 CPC)
Rejection of Late Documentary Evidence and Expert Confrontation Request
This provision was cited as the basis for rejecting the request for confrontation between experts or between experts and witnesses, as the CPC does not provide for such a confrontation.
HG.2010.405 · sg (Art. 174 ZPO)
LLC Partner Exclusion Due to Disappearance and Breach of Duty
Applied because the parties waived the right to an oral hearing, leading to a decision based on the file.
HG.2010.405 · sg (Art. 174 ZPO)
Shareholder Exclusion for Disappearance and Breach of Fiduciary Duty
This procedural rule was applied to confirm that no oral hearing would be held based on the parties' actions (or lack thereof).
VB.2009.00280 · zh (§ 174 ZPO)
Traffic Medicine Expert Report Sufficiency Upheld in License Withdrawal Case
This procedural code article is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' and relates to procedural aspects potentially applied in the decision framework.
CCC.2009.42 · ne (Art. 174 CPC)
Spousal Support Calculation Following Disability and Income Averaging Dispute
Cited to discuss the requirements for a withdrawal or acquiescence regarding the wife's claim for maintenance in 2007.
AA060046 · zh (Art. 174 der syrischen ZPO)
Enforcement of Syrian Arbitral Awards and Administrative Decisions: Service and Judicial Bias
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the possibility of filing a challenge, but not cited in the operative part.
RBOG.2007.Nr.28 · tg (§ 174 ZPO)
Appealability of Preliminary Injunction Pending Main Proceedings on Federal Law Grounds
Cited in the reasoning as the provision determining the competence of the District Court President for provisional measures based on federal law.
12.2005.158 · ti (Art. 174 CPC)
Vehicle Repair Cost Dispute and Procedural Challenges Appeal
Cited as the basis for the timeliness of the respondent's reply concerning the procedural switch.
12.2000.233 · ti (art. 174 e ss CPC)
Contractor's Claim for Payment Offset by Defects and Delay Penalties
Provisions governing the imposition of court costs in the appeal procedure.
CCC.1994.6856 · ne (art.174 al.2 CPC)
Spouse Appeal of Protective Order Regarding Support Amounts and Prior Agreement
Cited in the reasoning section regarding partial acquiescence, which justified the partial annulment of the lower court decision.