272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 171 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Form der Einvernahme
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Beweis; 3. Kapitel: Beweismittel
Art. 171 ZPO · Form der Einvernahme
Die Zeugin oder der Zeuge wird vor der Einvernahme zur Wahrheit ermahnt; nach Vollendung des 14. Altersjahres wird die Zeugin oder der Zeuge zudem auf die strafrechtlichen Folgen des falschen Zeugnisses (Art. 307 StGB ) hingewiesen.
Das Gericht befragt jede Zeugin und jeden Zeugen einzeln und in Abwesenheit der andern; vorbehalten bleibt die Konfrontation.
Das Zeugnis ist frei abzulegen; das Gericht kann die Benützung schriftlicher Unterlagen zulassen.
Das Gericht schliesst Zeuginnen und Zeugen von der übrigen Verhandlung aus, solange sie nicht aus dem Zeugenstand entlassen sind.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
ZVE.2022.31 · ag (Art. 171 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Employer Ordered to Pay Employee Due to Incapacitation
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the inadmissibility of the testimony of Dr. med. D. due to a violation of procedural rules concerning foreign witnesses.
C/11644/2016 · ge (art. 171 al. 1 1ère phr. CPC)
Employee Dismissal Justified Despite Procedural Errors in Lower Court Ruling
Cited regarding the admonition of witnesses to tell the truth, relevant to the finding that the trial court arbitrarily dismissed witnesses.
C/3359/2017 · ge (art. 171 let. a CPC)
Separation of Property Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence of Financial Threat
Cited to declare the appeal admissible regarding its timeliness and procedural basis.
LB160043 · zh (Art. 171 Abs. 4 ZPO)
Vehicle Sale Commission Agreement Validity
Justifies the exclusion of the plaintiff's brother from the hearing based on his prior notification as a witness.
AA080109 · zh (§ 171 ZPO)
Patient v. Private Psychiatric Clinic (Prescription of Tort Claims)
The alleged violation of the obligation to call an expert witness is discussed as a ground for nullity, supporting the decision to dismiss the appeal (point 2 of the dispositive).
HC.2009.45 · vd (art. 171 al. 1 CPC)
Lease Liability and Forgery Defense Appeal
This procedural provision is cited as the rule governing the burden of proof when authenticity of a signature is contested.
PZ 2007 99 · gr (Art. 171 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Shareholder Access to Merger Valuation Reports in Appraisal Action
Cited by the appellant in their main submissions regarding the refusal or restriction of access to the valuation report.
RBOG.2007.Nr.27 · tg (§ 171 ZPO)
Tenant Challenge to Property Handover Protocol Evidentiary Weight
This article was cited in the reasoning to describe the procedure for the taking over of tenancy objects by the political municipality, which is the context of the disputed protocol.
AGVE.2006.6 · ag (§ 171 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Combined Claims Exceeding Free Litigation Threshold Subject to Costs
Cited as the legal basis for joining separate lawsuits when certain conditions are met.
AGVE.2006.6 · ag (§ 171 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Consolidation of Claims Exceeding Fee-Free Threshold
This provision allows for the consolidation of separate claims when the conditions are met.
AGVE.2002.21 · ag (§ 171 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Father's Child Support Claim Not Improperly Assigned, But Must Be Heard in Ordinary Proceedings
Used to exclude the claim for maintenance of a major child from the summary divorce protection proceedings between the parents.
AGVE.2002.21 · ag (§ 171 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Parental Assignment of Adult Child's Maintenance Claims Not Permitted in Marital Protection Proceedings
Used to exclude the claim for maintenance of the adult child from the summary divorce protection proceedings between the parents.
AGVE.2002.20 · ag (§ 171 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Court Allows Judge to Question Sole Proprietorship Employee, Addresses Child Maintenance Claims in Divorce
This provision was used to exclude a child support claim filed by a child, which was being handled under accelerated proceedings, from the summary matrimonial protection proceedings between the parents.
AA070015 · zh (§§ 171 ff. ZPO)
Claimant v. Clinic Doctor (Spinal Manipulation Injury Causation)
Mentioned in the reasoning when discussing the limited evidentiary value of private expert opinions (like Prof. E.'s) compared to court-appointed experts.
AA080109 · zh (§ 171 ZPO/ZH)
Claimant v. Former Patient: Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Appeal
Cited in the introductory summary of provisions, concerning the calling of an expert witness, although the detailed reasoning implies the Tribunal found no violation based on facts explained by Dr. O.'s testimony.