272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 165 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Umfassendes Verweigerungsrecht
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Beweis; 2. Kapitel: Mitwirkungspflicht und Verweigerungsrecht
Art. 165 ZPO · Umfassendes Verweigerungsrecht
Jede Mitwirkung können verweigern: a. wer mit einer Partei verheiratet ist oder war oder eine faktische Lebensgemeinschaft führt; b. wer mit einer Partei gemeinsame Kinder hat; c. wer mit einer Partei in gerader Linie oder in der Seitenlinie bis und mit dem dritten Grad verwandt oder verschwägert ist; d. die Pflegeeltern, die Pflegekinder und die Pflegegeschwister einer Partei; e. die für eine Partei zur Vormundschaft oder zur Beistandschaft eingesetzte Person.
Die eingetragene Partnerschaft ist der Ehe gleichgestellt.
Die Stiefgeschwister sind den Geschwistern gleichgestellt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (46)
FR230417 · zh (Art. 165 f. ZPO)
Switzerland: Bank Records Disclosure for International Arbitration Upheld
Lists grounds on which a third party can refuse to cooperate in providing evidence.
CC 2022 104 · ju (Art. 165 al. 1 let. b CPC)
Tenant's Right to Refuse Collaboration in Estate Appraisal Supersedes Party Presence
Cited as the basis for the right of the appellant to refuse to cooperate in the expertise due to having a common child with a party to the proceedings.
40/2006/31 · sh (Art. 165 Abs. 1 Ziff. 3 ZPO)
Complaint Sufficiency for Judgment Entry
This provision was cited in the reasoning to establish that the original complaint fulfilled the validity requirement of minimal substantiation of the claim, leading to the granting of the appeal.
40/2006/15 · sh (Art. 165 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Appeal Regarding Production of Penal Order and Imposition of Sanctions
This provision, requiring the submission of documents held by the parties, was considered merely a procedural regulation and not establishing a comprehensive duty to produce documents.
LZ180020 · zh (Art. 165 f. ZPO)
Parental Agreement Upheld in Child Support and Custody Dispute
The court refers to these articles regarding the rights of witnesses to refuse testimony.
C/16268/2016 · ge (Art. 165 CPC)
Witness Fine Upheld for Failure to Appear at Labor Court
Cited in the reasoning regarding potential grounds for refusal to collaborate.
LB160026 · zh (Art. 165 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO)
Unsecured Loan Repayment Dispute Over Extinguishment Claim
Mentioned in the reasoning (Erwägung 6.8.2) regarding the right of a spouse to refuse to participate in proceedings, although not strictly in the dispositive, it is relevant to the procedural context discussed regarding witness E._____.
12.2015.51 · ti (art. 165 cpv. 3 CPC)
Artwork Injunction Upheld Due to Fiduciary Relationship and Risk of Irreparable Harm
Cited earlier in the proceedings by the appellants when requesting a security deposit.
11.2013.70 · ti (art. 165 segg. CPC ticinese)
Appeal Regarding Projection Right and Judge Immediacy in Evidentiary Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicable procedure, but not in the dispositive.
13.2012.36 · ti (art. 165 e seg. CPC)
Labor Dispute Indemnity Appeal: Admissibility of Evidence and Irreparable Prejudice
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rights of the third party (C.____) whose documents were requested.
NQ110038 · zh (Art. 165 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO i.V.m. § 193 GOG)
Untimely Appeal Regarding Guardianship Account Approval
Cited in the reasoning explaining why certain witnesses did not testify, which relates to the evidence considered before the final decision not to enter.
CC.2009.99 · ne (Art. 165 CPC)
Business Owner v. Municipality over Public Works Nuisances and Expropriation Law
Mentioned in relation to preserving the effect of lis pendens if the plaintiff pursues the administrative route.
14.2010.1 · ti (art. 165 cpv. 2 lett. g CPC)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Rejection of Opposition to Enforcement on Real Estate Pledge Secured by Fiduciary Mortgage Note
Cited in the final orders, referenced in relation to the clarity required in claims/petitum.
HG.2007.87 · sg (Art. 165 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Service Refusal and Enforcement of Non-Compete Clause
Cited to justify that setting a final deadline for the statement of defence was unnecessary because the defendant failed to participate in the proceedings.
HG.2007.87 · sg (Art. 165 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Breach of Exclusive Distribution Agreement and Jurisdiction by Refusal to Accept Service
Cited to justify that setting a subsequent deadline for the statement of defense was unnecessary because the defendant refused to participate.