Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 162 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Berechtigte Verweigerung der Mitwirkung

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Beweis; 2. Kapitel: Mitwirkungspflicht und Verweigerungsrecht
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 162 ZPO · Berechtigte Verweigerung der Mitwirkung

Verweigert eine Partei oder eine dritte Person die Mitwirkung berechtigterweise, so darf das Gericht daraus nicht auf die zu beweisende Tatsache schliessen.

← Art. 161 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 163 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (48)

ZZ.1990.19 · so (§ 162 ZPO)
Defendant v. Plaintiff (Procedural Order Appealability)
This provision is cited in the headnote regarding the subject matter that leads to the non-admissibility of the appeal.
A/2603/2019 · ge (art. 162 du Code de procédure civile suisse du 19 décembre 2008 (CPC))
Health Insurers v. Physician Overbilling and Obstruction
Provides for consequences when a party refuses to produce evidence, allowing the court to infer facts.
PP190052 · zh (Art. 162 ZPO)
Appeal Dismissed: Procedural Order Not Demonstrably Prejudicial
Cited in relation to the possibility of considering an (unjustified) refusal to cooperate during the assessment of evidence in the final judgment.
CACIV.2018.25 · ne (Art. 162 CPC)
Shareholder Preferential Subscription Right Rejection Due to Improper Capital Liberation
The request for validation of the blocking of the commercial register was based on this procedural provision.
NQ110038 · zh (Art. 162 ZPO)
Untimely Appeal Regarding Guardianship Account Approval
Cited in the reasoning regarding the exclusive consideration of other evidence when witnesses refused to testify, underpinning the decision not to enter in order 1.
AP.2010.266 · vd (Art. 162 CPC)
Withdrawal of Main Claim and Extinguishment of Cross-Claims
The court referenced this article as the basis for the first instance judge to assess costs when a party passes judgment by acquiescence (past-expédient).
AP.2010.267 · vd (art. 162 CPC)
Withdrawal of Claim and Entitlement to Costs for Called-In Party
Cited as the rule stating that the party who effectively waives judgment (passé-expédient) on all claims of the opponent must bear the costs.
165.II · vd (art. 162 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Allocation of Divorce Proceeding Costs
Cited in the reasoning regarding costs for the party who yields on all adversarial conclusions.
Pdt.TC.2010.9 · vd (Art. 162 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal on Legal Costs Allocation Following Settlement
Cited in the reasoning section, relevant contextually to the 'passé-expédient' decision.
AP.2009.236 · vd (Art. 162 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Allocation of Legal Costs Following Settlement in Agricultural Lease Dispute
Cited in the reasoning for the rule that the party passing the settlement is charged with the costs (though ultimately compensated/shared in the final orders).
AP.2009.236 · vd (Art. 162 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Allocation of Legal Costs Following Settlement in Agricultural Lease Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section (3a) regarding the cost allocation rule for the party passing the settlement (though the final order compensates costs between R. and A.).
HC.2009.456 · vd (Art. 162 CPC)
Admission of Liability and Award of Legal Costs Appeal
Cited in the introductory section listing applicable articles, related to the burden of costs.
Pdt.TC.2009.24 · vd (Art. 162 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal on Quantum of Court Costs in Divorce Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning regarding the jurisdiction over costs decided by the judge initiating the case in case of 'passé-expédient'.
ML.2009.79 · vd (Art. 162 al. 1 CPC)
Corporation Appeal on Liability for Legal Costs After Debt Payment
Cited in the legal reasoning concerning the general rule that the party who passes up (fails to respond fully to) the adversary's claims must bear the costs.
RBOG.2009.Nr.29 · tg (§§ 162 Abs. 3, 191, 230 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Appellate Review of New Factual Claims Based on Process Certificates
These provisions, concerning the procedure in summary proceedings (including the inadmissibility of evidence in certain cases), were cited in the introductory summary that frames the legal issues addressed by the court.