272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 161 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Aufklärung
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Beweis; 2. Kapitel: Mitwirkungspflicht und Verweigerungsrecht
Art. 161 ZPO · Aufklärung
Das Gericht klärt die Parteien und Dritte über die Mitwirkungspflicht, das Verweigerungsrecht und die Säumnisfolgen auf.
Unterlässt es die Aufklärung über das Verweigerungsrecht, so darf es die erhobenen Beweise nicht berücksichtigen, es sei denn, die betroffene Person stimme zu oder die Verweigerung wäre unberechtigt gewesen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (36)
RBOG.2006.Nr.38 · tg (§ 161 Ziff. 5 ZPO)
Summary Review of Law in Provisional Measures
Cited to establish that precautionary measures in pending proceedings are issued under the summary procedure.
ZZ.1983.7 · so (§ 161 ZPO)
Non-Appearance of Appellant at Appeal Hearing Does Not Cause Forfeiture.
Cited as a legal disadvantage the appellant must expect regarding the compensation for extra costs if personal questioning was scheduled and the appellant is absent.
PF210054 · zh (Art. 161 ZPO)
Appeal Regarding Procedural Order Compelling Disclosure and Sanctions
The failure of the lower court to inform the appellant of their right to refuse testimony, as required by this article, led to the annulment of the contested order.
VB.2019.00083 · zh (Art. 161 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Property Owner's Appeal Costs and Procedural Claims Dismissed
Cited concerning the duty to inform about the right to refuse testimony before an ocular inspection, which the court found was not violated.
LZ180020 · zh (Art. 161 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Parental Agreement Upheld in Child Support and Custody Dispute
The court refers to this article regarding the admonition of witnesses and their rights to refuse testimony.
1C 19 1 · lu (Art. 161 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appealability of Orders Compelling Non-Party Document Production
Cited to confirm that the lower court properly informed the appellant about their right to refuse cooperation.
VD.2018.41 · bs (Art. 161 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Settlement Permit Revocation Due to Criminal Convictions Upheld Despite Insufficient Proof of Prolonged Absence
Cited in reasoning concerning the duty to cooperate (Art. 90 AuG) and the consequences of non-cooperation.
Arr.t.2018.199 · vd (Art. 161 al. 1 CPC)
Guardianship Termination Appeal: Procedural Hearing Violation and Abandonment of Expert Investigation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the tribunal's duty to alert parties to their obligation to collaborate and the consequences of default, relevant to the procedural fault.
13.2016.15 · ti (art. 161 CPC)
Shareholder Disclosure Refusal Fine Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the judge's duty to inform parties/third parties about cooperation obligations and consequences.
TDSIO C2 15 70 · vs (Art. 161 CPC)
Employment Dispute: Unpaid Commissions and Production of Financial Records
Cited in the final orders to specify the court's duty to inform parties and third parties of their duty and right to refuse cooperation.
2014.07.09.zr.1 · bl (Art. 161 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Company fined for non-compliance in divorce proceeding, appeal upheld due to inadequate notice.
Cited as the legal basis for the requirement to inform parties and third parties about their duty to cooperate, the right to refuse, and the consequences of default.
RBOG.2007.Nr.28 · tg (§ 161 ZPO)
Appealability of Preliminary Injunction Pending Main Proceedings on Federal Law Grounds
Cited in the footnotes regarding the procedural aspect of summary proceedings.
11 06 7 · lu (§§ 49, 161 und 265 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Necessary Joint Claimants and Tactical Witness Manipulation
These provisions form the legal basis for the ultimate rejection of the appeal concerning the non-admission of intervention, witness testimony, and procedural rulings.
CC.2005.165 · ne (art. 161 CPC)
Domicile in Divorce Jurisdiction
Cited in relation to the duty to examine ex officio the question of forfeiture of the right to invoke a lack of jurisdiction.
CC.2005.1 · ne (art.161 ch.1 litt.a CPC)
Usufructuary Action Against Bare Owners Regarding Jurisdiction and Possession
This provision governed the procedural device (moyen préjudiciel) that the court ruled upon in order 1.