272
ZPOCPC
CH
Art. 156 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Wahrung schutzwürdiger Interessen
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 10. Titel: Beweis; 1. Kapitel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Art. 156 ZPO · Wahrung schutzwürdiger Interessen
Gefährdet die Beweisabnahme die schutzwürdigen Interessen einer Partei oder Dritter, wie insbesondere deren Geschäftsgeheimnisse, so trifft das Gericht die erforderlichen Massnahmen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (151)
C3 06 20 · vs (Art. 156 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Trade Secret Protection Overrides Document Production in Evidence Admission Appeal
This article, concerning the protection of business secrets, was considered when weighing the interest in secrecy against the right to document production.
S2023-011 (Art. 156 ZPO)
Ferinject® Patent Dispute: Balancing Disclosure and Confidentiality
Mentioned in the context of confidentiality measures, noting that the duration of these measures, when based on substantive law like Art. 68 PatG, is not limited to the duration of the proceedings, unlike those based solely on Art. 156 ZPO.
RT250130 · zh (Art. 156 ZPO)
Appeal Dismissed: Rejection of Reinstatement and Affirmation of Judicial Relief
Cited in the operative part (Order 1) to grant the applicant's request for protective measures regarding specific documents.
101 2025 56 · fr (Art. 156 CPC)
Confidentiality Agreement Dispute in Divorce Proceedings
Although central to the dispute, this article regarding evidence administration and protection of legitimate interests was cited in the reasoning for admissibility, but not explicitly in the final orders (I-IV).
ZOR.2024.41 · ag (Art. 156 ZPO)
Interlocutory Appeal of Divorce Proceedings Dismissed for Lack of Irreparable Harm
The court applied this article to grant the motion for protective measures regarding business documents.
ARMC.2024.72 · ne (art. 156 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Compelled Testimony and Scope of Waiver of Professional Secrecy
Cited multiple times in the reasoning regarding the protection of private interests, but is not explicitly mentioned in the final dispositive orders (1, 2, 3).
RB240015 · zh (Art. 156 ZPO)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Protective Non-Disclosure Order for Inheritance Dispute Filings
This provision governs protective measures (Schutzmassnahmen), which is the core subject matter of the appeal decided by the court.
HE240069 · zh (Art. 156 ZPO)
Radio D._____ Trademark Abandonment Preliminary Injunction Application Dismissal
Mentioned in the reasoning in reference to the procedural request by the respondents for protective measures, which was deemed obsolete.
WKL.2022.4 · ag (Art. 156 ZPO)
Employee's Illness-Based Termination Lawsuit Dismissed
Cited in relation to measures to protect a party's interests during evidence gathering.
HG210081 · zh (Art. 156 ZPO)
Foreign Energy Company v. Swiss Bank (Execution-Only Agreement)
Cited concerning the requirement to take necessary measures when evidence disclosure endangers protected interests.
ARMC.2024.5 · ne (Art. 156 CPC)
Employee Wrongful Dismissal Appeal Regarding Admissibility of Illicitly Obtained Emails
Cited in the reasoning when dismissing the argument that the judge failed to protect business secrets.
HSU.2024.1 · ag (Art. 156 ZPO)
Customer List Use Permitted as Collaborative Work Product
This provision allows the court to take necessary protective measures if the taking of evidence endangers the protected interests of a party or a third party, such as business secrets.
HSU.2023.29 · ag (Art. 156 ZPO)
Solex trademark dispute: No likelihood of confusion with Sola mark
Cited by the respondent regarding the protection of business secrets in the context of disclosing accounting documents.
C3 22 71 · vs (Art. 156 CPC)
Attorney-Client Privilege Versus Confidentiality in Discovery Access
The court modified the initial decision regarding protective measures against disclosure of confidential information based on this article.
13.2022.85 · ti (art. 156 CPC)
Evidentiary Ruling Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Immediate Harm and Untimely Arguments
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the appellant's argument concerning trade secrets protection, but not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders.