272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 15 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Streitgenossenschaft und Klagenhäufung

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 2. Titel: Zuständigkeit der Gerichte und Ausstand; 2. Kapitel: Örtliche Zuständigkeit

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 15 ZPO · Streitgenossenschaft und Klagenhäufung

Richtet sich die Klage gegen mehrere Streitgenossen, so ist das für eine beklagte Partei zuständige Gericht für alle beklagten Parteien zuständig, sofern diese Zuständigkeit nicht nur auf einer Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung beruht.

Stehen mehrere Ansprüche gegen eine beklagte Partei in einem sachlichen Zusammenhang, so ist jedes Gericht zuständig, das für einen der Ansprüche zuständig ist.

← Art. 14 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 16 ZPO →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (114)

HE240069 · zh (Art. 15 Abs. 1 und 2 ZPO)

Radio D._____ Trademark Abandonment Preliminary Injunction Application Dismissal

Cited in the reasoning in connection with Art. 13 lit. a ZPO to establish local and material jurisdiction (uncontested).

HE230126 · zh (Art. 15 ZPO)

Staffing Company's Preliminary Injunction Against Former Employees and Competitor Denied

Cited to affirm local jurisdiction over co-defendants because one co-defendant (Aggregator 7) is domiciled in the canton.

BV.2022.00020 · zh (Art. 15 ZPO)

Pension Provider Liability for Disability Benefits

Permits the joinder of multiple defendants in a lawsuit.

C/10806/2019 · ge (Art. 15 al. 2 CPC)

Geneva Courts Assert Jurisdiction Over Contractual and Tort Claims Related to Manuscript Collection

Cited in the reasoning to justify competence over the loan claims by attraction to the competence established for the sales contracts (connexity).

MP.2022.7 · vd (art. 15 al. 1 CPC)

Provisional Measures Denied in Flameless Burner Unfair Competition Case

Cited regarding the extension of jurisdiction to all defendants when jurisdiction is established against one defendant.

HOR.2021.13 · ag (Art. 15 Abs. 2 ZPO)

Conditional Real Estate Agreements Voided Due to Incomplete Building Application

This provision relates to the court's territorial jurisdiction based on the place of performance of the obligation.

A/1487/2021 · ge (art. 15 al. 2 CPC)

Insured Disability Benefits Claim Success Due to Probable Masked Depression Despite Late Filing and Missed Appointments

Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the court for the damages claim due to its connection with the main claim based on the insurance contract.

A/1545/2021 · ge (Art. 15 al. 2 CPC)

Insurer's Right to Cancel Supplementary Insurance Based on Non-Disclosure of Planned Fertility Examinations

Cited in the reasoning concerning the connection (connexité) between the main claim and the secondary claim for damages, establishing the jurisdiction for both.

LB210037 · zh (Art. 15 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Partnership Dissolution and Legal Succession in Litigation Standing

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the court's jurisdiction extends to the second defendant due to the permissible joinder of parties.

O2018-004 (Art. 15 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Patent Holder's Mid-Litigation Claim Amendment and Unfair Competition Finding

Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the Federal Patent Court.

200 2017 967 · be (Art. 15 ZPO)

Insured Person v. Occupational Benefit Schemes (Invalidity Pension Liability)

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the permissibility of passive subjective claim joinder.

200 2009 1196 · be (Art. 15 der Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung vom 19. Dezember 2008 (ZPO; SR 272))

Insured Loses Claim Against Pension Schemes Over Disability Onset Date and Premium Reimbursement

Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of passive subjective joinder of parties (Klagenhäufung).

LB180037 · zh (Art. 15 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Jurisdiction Over Second Insurer Dismissed in Separate Accident Case

Cited to explain that it cannot be applied because it requires the prerequisite of a joinder of parties.

ZK 2018 454 · be (art. 15 al. 1 CPC)

Canton of Bern v. Parents (Family Accompaniment Costs)

Cited in the reasoning regarding territorial jurisdiction, but not in the dispositive orders.

FO.2016.20.21 · sg (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. a EG ZPO)

Case Concerning Pre-determination of Shared Extraordinary Child Costs in Divorce Proceedings

This procedural rule is cited to explain why the request for a general determination of extraordinary costs is inappropriate for this specific proceeding.