Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 136 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Zuzustellende Urkunden

ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 9. Titel: Prozessleitung, prozessuales Handeln und Fristen; 2. Kapitel: Formen des prozessualen Handelns
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (426 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 136 ZPO · Zuzustellende Urkunden

Das Gericht stellt den betroffenen Personen insbesondere zu: a. Vorladungen; b. Verfügungen und Entscheide; c. Eingaben der Gegenpartei.

← Art. 135 ZPO Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 137 ZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (160)

LF250015 · zh (Art. 136 lit. b ZPO)
Appellate Court Overturns Company Dissolution Due to Defective Service and Failure to Exhaust Investigation
Cited as the provision defining the judicial documents subject to service rules.
C3 24 23 · vs (art. 136 CPC)
Appeal Allowed Due to Irregular Notification Violating Right to Be Heard
The decision was annulled and the case was sent back to the lower court to repeat the procedure, including proper notification of decisions against the appellant, as required by this article.
C1 24 61 · vs (art. 136 let. a et b CPC)
Curatorship Upheld Over Procedural Challenges and Management Failures
Cited in the reasoning concerning the rules for serving citations and decisions, which forms the basis for rejecting the procedural grievance.
C/5970/2023 · ge (art. 136 let. b CPC)
Appellant v. Appellee: Challenge to Extension of Time to File Statement of Defense in Labor Dispute
Cited in the reasoning regarding the notification duties of the court.
PP240025 · zh (Art. 136 ff. ZPO)
[Company Name] v. [Other Company Name]: Improper Summons Service Appeal
Cited as the relevant provisions governing service of court documents.
LF230063 · zh (Art. 136 lit. b ZPO)
Appellate Court Annuls Dissolution Due to Insufficient Service of Process
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the rules of Art. 136 et seq. ZPO apply to the service of judicial decisions.
LF230016 · zh (Art. 136 ff. ZPO)
LLC Dissolution Overturned Due to Improper Service and Lack of Due Process
These provisions were cited in the reasoning regarding the rules for serving court documents, but they are not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders.
LF230016 · zh (Art. 136 lit. b ZPO)
LLC Dissolution Overturned Due to Improper Service and Lack of Due Process
This provision was cited in the reasoning about the scope of service rules, but it is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders.
ZSU.2022.209 · ag (Art. 136 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Condominium Association Prevails in Dispute Over External Installations
This provision was referenced regarding the court's discretion in ordering enforcement measures.
RU220032 · zh (Art. 136 ZPO)
Vehicle Contract Service Dispute and Denial of Justice Claim
Cited in the reasoning (Section 4.1) regarding the general rule for court delivery of documents to the concerned persons.
LF210080 · zh (Art. 136 lit. b ZPO)
Company Liquidation Over Organizational Defect Reversed Due to Improper Service of Process
This provision confirms that court decisions are subject to the service rules outlined in Art. 136 ff. ZPO.
3----------- · vd (art. 136 let. c CPC)
State v. Debtor (Service of Process on Request for Release of Opposition to Payment Order)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure for notifying the adverse party's documents.
ML.2021.246 · vd (Art. 136 let. c CPC)
Appeal Regarding Improper Notification in Debt Collection Provisional Release Case
Cited in the reasoning regarding notification requirements, but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders.
ML.2021.227 · vd (Art. 136 let. c CPC)
Summary Proceeding Appeal on Definitive Lifting of Opposition Due to Defective Service
Cited in the reasoning regarding the method of notification, although the main ground for annulment was the violation of the right to be heard.
ML.2021.214 · vd (Art. 136 let. c CPC)
Taxpayer v. Tax Authority Regarding Definitive Lifting of Opposition to Payment Order
Cited in the reasoning concerning the required manner of notification (though not explicitly in the final orders, it is part of the analysis leading to the finding of procedural error).