272
ZPOCPC
CH
CH
Art. 102 Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO) - Vorschuss für Beweiserhebungen
ZPO; 1. Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 8. Titel: Prozesskosten und unentgeltliche Rechtspflege; 1. Kapitel: Prozesskosten
Art. 102 ZPO · Vorschuss für Beweiserhebungen
Jede Partei hat die Auslagen des Gerichts vorzuschiessen, die durch von ihr beantragte Beweiserhebungen veranlasst werden.
Beantragen die Parteien dasselbe Beweismittel, so hat jede Partei die Hälfte vorzuschiessen.
Leistet eine Partei ihren Vorschuss nicht, so kann die andere die Kosten vorschiessen; andernfalls unterbleibt die Beweiserhebung. Vorbehalten bleiben Streitigkeiten, in denen das Gericht den Sachverhalt von Amtes wegen zu erforschen hat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (159)
C/9130/2024 · ge (art. 102 CPC)
Refusal of Additional Witness Examination Based on Evidence Sufficiency
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to advance costs for the administration of evidence.
HSU.2025.35 · ag (Art. 102 ZPO)
Provisional Construction Lien Granted Pending Lawsuit
This provision is cited in relation to the advance payment of court costs.
ZR1 2025 32 · gr (art. 102 CPC)
Expert Witness Cost Advance Payment and Right to be Heard
Cited as the legal basis for the decision regarding the advance payment for the expert opinion, which was the subject of the contested decision.
C/1228/2024 · ge (Art. 102 CPC)
Intermediary Contract Termination Disputes: Penalties, Commissions, and Witness Testimony
Cited as the basis for ordering one party to pay the advance for the witness's compensation.
C/18827/2021 · ge (art. 102 CPC)
Appeal Regarding Expert Valuation Advance Fee and Cost Allocation
Cited to confirm that the obligation to advance costs lies with the party requesting the evidentiary measure, supporting the decision on cost allocation.
C/20212/2020 · ge (art. 102 CPC)
Appellant v. Lower Court Order on Witness Indemnities
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rules for advancing costs for evidence administration, which is central to the dispute over witness fees.
C3 24 44 · vs (Art. 102 al. 2 CPC)
Shareholder vs. Company on Advance Payment for Special Investigation
Cited to explain why this specific procedural rule regarding advancing costs for evidence is inapplicable in this context.
C/25223/2013 · ge (art. 102 al. 1 CPC)
Divorce Asset Valuation Dispute and Provisional Cost Allocation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to justify the modification of the cost advance allocation, as the expertise was requested by both parties.
C/25223/2013 · ge (art. 102 al. 2 CPC)
Divorce Asset Valuation Dispute and Provisional Cost Allocation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to justify that when both parties request the same means of proof, each advances half the costs, leading to the modification of the cost advance order.
A/606/2024 · ge (Art. 102 CPC)
Claimant v. Insurance Office: Appeal for Disability Benefits and Order for Judicial Expertise
This article is cited in the reasoning regarding the costs awarded to the parties.
RB230036 · zh (Art. 102 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Cost Sharing for Joint Expert Opinion in Traffic Accident Case
The court upheld the appeal, ordering that the cost deposit for the expert evidence be paid equally by both parties as stipulated by this article because both parties requested the same evidence.
ARMP.2024.71 · ne (Art. 102 CPC)
Property Co-Owners v. Lower Court on Expert Fee Advance and Right to be Heard
Cited in the reasoning regarding the allocation of costs for evidence administration, although the final order did not explicitly cite it for the merits.
13.2024.15 · ti (art. 102 CPC)
Labor Dispute on Expert Witness Fees and Appointment Following Injury Dismissal
Cited in reasoning to explain the general rule that parties must advance the costs of evidence they request.
C/24697/2016 · ge (Art. 102 al. 1 CPC)
Expert Witness Fee and Access to Prior Report in Malpractice Case Appeal
This provision on the obligation for parties to advance costs was referenced in the reasoning related to the excessive cost advance determined by the lower court.
ARMC.2023.60 · ne (Art. 102 al. 2 CPC)
Appeal Admissibility Due to Lack of Notification; Expert Cost Allocation Remanded
Cited in order 3 to establish the basis for allocating costs after the appeal was admitted, although the final allocation required remission to the lower court.