251
KGLCart
CH
CH
Art. 32 Bundesgesetz vom 6. Oktober 1995 über Kartelle und andere Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (KG) - Einleitung des Prüfungsverfahrens
KG; 4. Kapitel: Verwaltungsrechtliches Verfahren
Art. 32 KG · Einleitung des Prüfungsverfahrens
Wird ein Vorhaben über einen Unternehmenszusammenschluss gemeldet (Art. 9), so entscheidet die Wettbewerbskommission, ob eine Prüfung durchzuführen ist. Sie hat die Einleitung dieser Prüfung den beteiligten Unternehmen innerhalb eines Monats seit der Meldung mitzuteilen. Erfolgt innerhalb dieser Frist keine Mitteilung, so kann der Zusammenschluss ohne Vorbehalt vollzogen werden.
Die beteiligten Unternehmen dürfen den Zusammenschluss innerhalb eines Monats seit der Meldung des Vorhabens nicht vollziehen, es sei denn, die Wettbewerbskommission habe dies auf Antrag dieser Unternehmen aus wichtigen Gründen bewilligt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (16)
VPB 2007.2884 (Art. 32 LCart)
Fenaco-Steffen-Ris Merger Review by Competition Commission
This provision is cited as the basis for opening an examination procedure concerning the concentration.
VPB 2002.1214 (Art. 32 LCart)
Retailer Merger Examination
This provision establishes the basis for opening an examination procedure for concentrations.
WBE.2024.154 · ag (§ 32 KG)
Heritage Protection Order Upheld for Architecturally Significant Building
Regulates the protection of ensembles.
WEKO · Zusammenschlussvorha (Art. 32 Abs. 1 KG)
Competition Commission's Statement on Bank Merger and Recommendations
This provision sets the deadline for preliminary merger review, which is discussed in the context of the procedural deviations.
WEKO · Zusammenschlussvorha (Art. 32 Abs. 2 KG)
Competition Commission's Statement on Bank Merger and Recommendations
This provision was invoked by FINMA to grant early completion of the merger for important reasons.
RRB.Nr.2023.000525 · ag (§ 32 KG)
Solar Panel Aesthetics vs. Heritage Preservation
This provision is cited as the basis for dismissing the appeal due to the protection of the surroundings of a protected monument.
WBE.2022.145 · ag (§ 32 KG)
Historical Building Protection Upheld Against Owner's Appeal
Used to explain the protection of the surroundings of protected monuments.
4.EV.2012.3 · ag (§ 32 KG)
Municipality Expropriation Compensation and Damages Award
Provides a basis for considering heritage protection when making decisions that may impact historical buildings and their surroundings.
RRB.Nr.2014.000285 · ag (§ 32 KG)
Chimney Permit Denial Due to Visual Impact on Protected Townscape and Heritage Sites
Basis for assessing the impact of the construction on protected cultural monuments and their surroundings.
AGVE.2015.73 · ag (§ 32 KG)
Building Permit Denial Upheld: Chimneys Harm Protected Townscape
Cited as the legal basis for considering replacement measures in the proportionality assessment concerning the impact on cantonal heritage monuments.
AGVE.2010.89 · ag (§§ 31 und 32 KG)
Municipality's Rejection of Cellular Tower Permit Upheld for Visual Impairment
These provisions are cited concerning the protection of the surroundings of monuments, which aligns with the objective of protecting local townscapes.
RRB.Nr.2010.000958 · ag (§§ 31 und 32 KG)
Mobile Antenna Permit Denial Upheld Due to Visual Impact on Historic Landmarks
Cited as the legal basis for environmental protection of monuments, which aligns with the protection goals of townscapes.
VPB 6264-2007-2359 (Art. 32 LCart)
Copper Producer Merger Review
This provision is cited in the title of the publication, indicating it is the legal basis for opening the examination procedure for the concentration.
VPB 2007.1917 (Art. 32 LCart)
Retail Cooperative's Proposed Acquisition of Electronics and Online Retailers
Cited as the legal basis for opening an examination procedure for the concentration.
VPB 3480-2007-1186 (art. 32 LCart)
Swiss Retail Merger Investigation
Cited as the basis for opening the examination procedure regarding the concentration.