232.12
DESGLDES
CH
CH
Art. 41 Bundesgesetz vom 5. Oktober 2001 über den Schutz von Design (DesG) - Designrechtsverletzung
DesG; 3. Kapitel: Rechtsschutz
Art. 41 DesG · Designrechtsverletzung
Eine Person wird auf Antrag der Rechtsinhaberin mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu einem Jahr oder Geldstrafe bestraft, wenn sie deren Designrecht vorsätzlich verletzt, indem sie: a. das Design widerrechtlich gebraucht; b. bei einer Gebrauchshandlung mitwirkt, deren Begehung begünstigt oder erleichtert; c. sich weigert, der zuständigen Behörde die Herkunft und den Umfang der in ihrem Besitz befindlichen, widerrechtlich hergestellten Gegenstände anzugeben und AdressatsowieUmfang einer Weitergabe an gewerbliche Abnehmerinnen und Abnehmer zu nennen.
Gewerbsmässige Handlungen werden von Amtes wegen verfolgt. Die Strafe ist Freiheitsstrafe bis zu fünf Jahren oder Geldstrafe. ...
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
SB100076 · zh (Art. 41 Abs. 1 lit. a in Verbindung mit Abs. 2 DesG)
Design and Trademark Infringement Case Dismissed
Used to acquit the defendants of the charge of design infringement due to lack of novelty and originality of the design.
10.2009.381 · ti (art. 41 cpv. 1 LDes)
Design Right Infringement and Confiscation of Counterfeit Goods
Article cited in the verdict for acquitting the defendant of violation of design law.
CCP.2008.102 · ne (Art. 41 LDES)
Appellant Convicted for Receiving Stolen Goods and Trademark/Design Violations Due to Misappropriated Watch Dials
This article established the conviction for violation of design rights.
CCP.2008.102 · ne (Art. 41/2 LDes)
Appellant Convicted for Receiving Stolen Goods and Trademark/Design Violations Due to Misappropriated Watch Dials
The aggravating circumstance of acting by trade (par métier) was applied under this provision for the violation of design rights conviction.
INC.2008.63802 · ti (Art. 41 LDes)
Prosecutor's Seizure Order of Watches Upheld Pending Counterfeit Goods Investigation
Cited in the P.Q.M. as a legal basis for the substantive matter under investigation, which justifies the seizure.
INC.2008.63801 · ti (art. 41 LDes)
Seizure Lapse Due to Lack of Continued Justification
Cited in the summary of applicable provisions, relating to the grounds for seizure based on Cantonal Law on Distraint.
10.2006.57 · ti (Art. 41 cpv. 1 lett. a) e b) LDes)
Director Acquitted of Counterfeiting but Convicted of Design Right Infringement in Watch Component Case
This article is the legal basis for the conviction of the accused for design right infringement.
10.2002.158 · ti (art. 41 LDes)
Director Acquitted of Trademark Counterfeiting Despite Confiscation of Goods
Cited in the dispositive as the current law applicable to the confiscation order, replacing previous articles.
10.2002.164 · ti (art. 41 LDes)
State v. Italian Citizen: Counterfeiting and Industrial Design Infringement (Acquittal with Confiscation)
Cited in the list of articles reviewed before ruling, but not explicitly used in the final orders of acquittal or costs.
10.2006.57 · ti (art. 41 cpv. 1 lett. a) e b) LDes)
Acquittal for Counterfeiting, Conviction for Design Right Violation via Replica Watch Importation
The defendant was convicted of violating design rights based on this provision.
INC.2008.63802 · ti (Art. 41 LDes)
Prosecutor v. Claimant (Seizure of Allegedly Counterfeit Watches)
Cited among the provisions whose potential violation justifies the seizure/investigation.
SB100076 · zh (Art. 41 Abs. 1 lit. a in Verbindung mit Abs. 2 DesG)
Cantonal High Court Overturns Design Infringement Conviction Due to Lack of Novelty and Insufficient Trademark Complaint
This article defines the design infringement offense for which the appellants were acquitted in orders 1 and 2.