232.11
MSCHGLPM
CH
CH
Art. 59 Bundesgesetz vom 28. August 1992 über den Schutz von Marken und Herkunftsangaben (MSchG) - Vorsorgliche Massnahmen
MSchG; 3. Titel: Rechtsschutz; 1. Kapitel: Zivilrechtlicher Schutz
Art. 59 MSchG · Vorsorgliche Massnahmen
Ersucht eine Person um die Anordnung vorsorglicher Massnahmen, so kann sie insbesondere verlangen, dass das Gericht Massnahmen anordnet: a. zur Beweissicherung; b. zur Ermittlung der Herkunft widerrechtlich mit der Marke oder der Herkunftsangabe versehener Gegenstände; c. zur Wahrung des bestehenden Zustandes; oder d. zur vorläufigen Vollstreckung von Unterlassungs- und Beseitigungsansprüchen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (32)
20/2010/2A · sh (Art. 59 Abs. 1 MSchG)
Appellate Court Jurisdiction Over Preliminary IP Injunctions Denied Due to Insufficient Substantiation of Irreparable Harm
This provision sets the requirement for requesting precautionary measures, which the court used as the basis for rejecting the request due to insufficient substantiation of irreparable harm.
C/21992/2020 · ge (Art. 59 let. d LPM)
Luxury Brand Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Case
Cited as one of the bases for ordering provisional measures to ensure the temporary prevention or cessation of the infringement.
C/5661/2020 · ge (art. 59 let. d LPM)
Trademark Holder v. Former Concessionaire Regarding Trademark Use After Contract Termination
This provision, cited indirectly in the reasoning (2.3 and 2.4), is the basis for ordering provisional measures in trademark law, consistent with the main prohibition order.
1F 18 3 · lu (Art. 59 Abs. 2 MSchG)
Trademark Infringement Preliminary Injunction and Limited Discovery Order
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional measure concerning the request for disclosure (request 3), although this request was ultimately denied.
C/2445/2018 · ge (Art. 59 let. d LPM)
Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Provisional Injunction
Article cited as the basis for ordering provisional measures concerning trademark protection.
C/6847/2017 · ge (art. 59 let. d LPM)
Jewelry Trademark and Design Infringement Suit Rebuffed for Lack of Imminent Harm and Sufficient Modification
Cited as a basis for ordering provisional measures in the context of trademark protection.
HE160329 · zh (Art. 59 MSchG)
Trademark Owner v. Importer (Counterfeit Watches)
Specifies the types of measures that can be ordered by the court, including evidence preservation, determination of origin, maintenance of the status quo, and provisional enforcement of injunctions and removal claims.
AbR.2004.05.Nr.10 · ow (Art. 59 MSchG)
Unfair Competition Act Expedited Proceedings Override Court Holidays in Preliminary Injunction Cases
This provision is mentioned in relation to provisional measures under the Trademark Protection Act, but the court ultimately decides that court holidays do not apply even when this law is invoked alongside the Unfair Competition Act.
C/26345/2014 · ge (Art. 59 let. d LPM)
Trademark Holder v. Counterfeiters (Domain Blocking)
Express authorization for measures intended to ensure the provisional prevention or cessation of trademark infringement.
HE130235 · zh (Art. 59 lit. d MSchG)
Verein A1. v. Swiss Hostels Preliminary Injunction Denial
Cited in the requests in connection with the demand for removal and destruction of materials related to the trademark (Request 3).
HG.2013.148.HG.2013 · sg (Art. 59 lit. d MSchG)
Trademark Infringement Claim Denied Due to Agent Trademark Status and Customs Retention Authority
The court rejected the request for a provisional injunction regarding the use of a trademark because the prerequisites for granting such an injunction were not met.
HG.2013.148.HG.2013.149.HG.2013.153 · sg (Art. 59 lit. d MSchG)
Trademark Dispute and Customs Hold Dismissal
The court dismissed the requests for precautionary injunctions based on this article because the requirements for ordering a provisional prohibition on trademark use were not met.
HG.2013.148.HG.2013 · sg (Art. 59 lit. d MSchG)
Provisional Measures in Customs Hold and Trademark Infringement Dispute
The court rejected the requests for provisional prohibition of trademark use because the prerequisites were not met, as the respondent credibly demonstrated rights under Art. 4 MSchG.
C/27039/2012 · ge (art. 59 let. d LPM)
Automobile Manufacturer v. Chinese Competitor (Model Designation Dispute)
Cited implicitly as the legal basis for seeking provisional measures regarding trademark infringement, although the specific procedural provision used in the final orders is CPC related.
OG ARGVP 2012 3591 · ar (Art. 59 MSchG)
Child Standing in Support Appeal and Trademark Likelihood of Confusion
Cited as the legal basis for the content and purpose of the preliminary measures ordered (provisional enforcement of injunctions and removal claims).