Art. 34 Bundesgesetz vom 28. August 1992 über den Schutz von Marken und Herkunftsangaben (MSchG) - Parteientschädigung

B-358/2022 (Art. 34 LPM)

Cherie v. Cherry.TV: Likelihood of Confusion Not Found Due to Semantic Differences

This article concerns the payment of costs by the opposing party in opposition proceedings before the lower authority.

B-5276/2022 (Art. 34 LPM)

CAFFETTINO v. Cafettone: Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Rejected Due to Weak Distinctiveness

Cited for the award of costs in opposition proceedings before the lower authority.

B-2338/2022 (Art. 34 LPM)

ZARA v. zämä: No Likelihood of Confusion Due to Lack of Phonetic and Conceptual Similarity

This article is cited regarding the award of 'depenses' in the opposition procedure before the lower authority, reflecting the outcome of the appeal.

B-6734/2023 (Art. 34 MSchG)

Burek King v. Burger King

This provision is used to establish the legal basis for the lower instance to determine costs and compensation between parties in opposition proceedings.

B-6169/2020 (Art. 34 MSchG)

ADVENTURIDGE Trademark Opposition: Insufficient Proof of Use

This provision was mentioned in the appellant's request regarding the allocation of costs.

B-938/2021 (Art. 34 MSchG)

VolksWerkstatt v. VOLKSWAGEN Trademark Infringement

This provision determines how costs of the previous instance are handled by the higher court.

B-3464/2020 (Art. 34 MSchG)

Ägeribier Trademark Dispute: Likelihood of Confusion Found

Determines the replacement of costs in the proceedings before the lower instance.

B-4451/2019 (Art. 34 MSchG)

La Barocca Opposition Case

This provision governs the determination of cost reimbursement in proceedings before the lower instance (Vorinstanz). It was used to order the defendant to reimburse the plaintiff for costs incurred in the lower instance.

B-1398/2020 (Art. 34 LPM)

Planète + (fig.) vs. Perpetual Planet: Likelihood of Confusion Analysis

Cited for determining costs and expenses in the opposition procedure before the lower authority.

B-148/2020 (Art. 34 MSchG)

Trademark Opposition: Partial Success Entitles Opposer to Fee Reimbursement

Provides the basis for awarding party compensation in opposition proceedings, which is considered an exception in federal administrative proceedings.

B-970/2019 (Art. 34 MSchG)

Verbal Identity, Visual Distinction: Trademark Registration Upheld

Cited for determining the substitution of costs in the previous instance.

B-5739/2017 (Art. 34 MSchG)

AREA INTERNATIONAL v. AREAMoney

This provision stipulates that the lower instance determines the extent to which the costs of the previous proceedings are to be reimbursed by the losing party, leading the court to confirm the prior cost allocation.

B-4538/2017 (Art. 34 LPM)

Nickelodeon vs. Monster Energy: Court Reverses Likelihood of Confusion Finding

This provision concerns the award of costs for the opposition proceedings before the lower authority.

B-4574/2017 (Art. 34 LPM)

COCO vs. COCOO (fig.): Jewelry Trademark Dispute Decided

Basis for awarding legal costs (dépens) in proceedings before the lower authority.

B-2208/2016 (Art. 34 LPM)

SKYFIVE vs. SKY - Partial Revocation of Trademark Registration

Cited regarding the allocation of costs and attorney fees in the lower instance.