Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
232.11 MSCHGLPM CH

Art. 33 Bundesgesetz vom 28. August 1992 über den Schutz von Marken und Herkunftsangaben (MSchG) - Entscheid über den Widerspruch

MSchG; 1. Titel: Marken; 3. Kapitel: Eintragung der Marken
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (111 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 33 MSchG · Entscheid über den Widerspruch

Ist der Widerspruch begründet, so wird die Eintragung ganz oder teilweise widerrufen; andernfalls wird der Widerspruch abgewiesen.

← Art. 32 MSchG Bundesgesetz vom 28. August 1992 über den Schutz von Marken und Herkunftsangaben (MSchG) - Begriff Art. 34 MSchG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (20)

B-4752/2022 (art. 33 LPM)
Trademark Opposition Suspension Upheld Pending Cancellation Proceedings
Cited regarding the consequences of opposition proceedings (revocation or rejection).
B-6169/2020 (Art. 33 MSchG)
ADVENTURIDGE Trademark Opposition: Insufficient Proof of Use
This provision was mentioned in the appellant's request concerning the revocation of the registration.
B-5145/2015 (art. 33 LPM)
SWISSCELL v. The SwissCellSpa EXPERIENCE (Cosmetic Trademark Opposition)
Cited in conjunction with art. 3 al. 1 let. c LPM as the legal basis for admitting the opposition.
B-3824/2015 (Art. 33 LPM)
Jean Leon v. Don Leone (Fig.)
Cited in conjunction with Article 3 al. 1 let. c LPM as the basis for rejecting the opposition.
B-1481/2015 (Art. 33 LPM)
Ice Watch v. NICE watch - Likelihood of Confusion Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for opposition proceedings concerning trademarks.
B-2326/2014 (Art. 33 LPM)
ENAGHR (fig.) Trademark Opposition Rejected
This article likely pertains to the procedure or grounds for opposition in trademark law, as the court references it alongside Article 3 al. 1 let. c LPM to reject the opposition.
B-6637/2014 (Art. 33 LPM)
SENSATIONAIL Trademark Opposition Proceedings
Basis for the oppositions against the contested marks.
B-159/2014 (art. 33 LPM)
Belvedere vs. Ca'Belvedere Amarone
Ground for rejection of the appeal, as the opposition formed against the contested mark must be admitted.
B-3162/2010 (Art. 33 MSchG)
Trademark Infringement: "5TH AVENUE" Footwear Protection vs. "AVENUE" Generic Use
This provision outlines the consequences of a successful opposition, namely the revocation of the mark's registration, in whole or in part.
B-137/2009 (Art. 33 LPM)
DIAPASON ROGERS COMMODITY INDEX trademark opposition
Cited as the legal basis for revoking a trademark in whole or in part if an opposition is upheld.
B-576/2009 (art. 33 LPM)
Trademark Opposition for Analgesics Rejected Due to Insufficient Proof of Use
The court used this article to reject the oppositions, as the opposition was not founded on a valid protected mark.
B-7352/2008 (Art. 33 LPM)
TORRE SARACENA v. TORRES: Likelihood of Confusion and Descriptive Nature of Geographic Indication
Outlines the consequences of an opposition being founded (revocation) or rejected.
B-7515/2008 (Art. 33 LPM)
Kool Tobacco Trademark Opposition Rejected
This article specifies that if an opposition is founded, the registration is revoked in whole or in part; otherwise, the opposition is rejected.
B-2635/2008 (Art. 33 MSchG)
Molinari v. monari Trademark Dispute
This article is cited as the legal basis for the consequences of a justified opposition, namely the revocation of the registration.
B-6770/2007 (art. 33 LPM)
Trademark Opposition Rejected Due to Descriptive Elements in Marks
This article governs the outcome of opposition proceedings, stating that the registration is revoked in whole or in part if the opposition is founded, or rejected otherwise.